Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879087›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of family medicine

COPD Population in US Primary Care: Data From the Optimum Patient Care DARTNet Research Database and the Advancing the Patient Experience in COPD Registry.

Wilson D Pace, Elias Brandt, Victoria A Carter, Ku-Lang Chang, Chelsea L Edwards, Alexander Evans, Chester Fox, Gabriela Gaona, MeiLan K Han, Alan G Kaplan and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving Patient-Centric COPD Management.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Wilson D PaceDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
Elias BrandtDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
Victoria A CarterOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ku-Lang ChangUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Chelsea L EdwardsOptimum Patient Care, Brisbane, Australia.
Alexander EvansOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chester FoxDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
Gabriela GaonaDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
MeiLan K HanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Alan G KaplanObservational & Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore.
Rachel KentDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
Janwillem W H KocksObservational & Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore.
Maja KruszykOptimum Patient Care, Brisbane, Australia.
Chantal E Le LievreOptimum Patient Care, Brisbane, Australia.
Tessa Li VotiOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cathy MahleBoehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
Barry MakeDepartment of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
Amanda R RatiganDARTNet Institute, Aurora, Colorado.
Asif ShaikhBoehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
Neil SkolnikThomas Jefferson University, Woodbury, New Jersey.
Brooklyn StanleyOptimum Patient Care, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Barbara P YawnUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David B PriceObservational & Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; dprice@opri.sg.
Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute · SGBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USNational Jewish Health · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe demographic and clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients managed in US primary care.

methodsThis was an observational registry study using data from the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Optimum Patient Care DARTNet Research Database from which the Advancing the Patient Experience COPD registry is derived. Registry patients were aged ≥35 years at diagnosis. Electronic health record data were collected from both registries, supplemented with patient-reported information/outcomes from the Advancing the Patient Experience registry from 5 primary care groups in Texas, Ohio, Colorado, New York, and North Carolina (June 2019 through November 2020).

resultsOf 17,192 patients included, 1,354 were also in the Advancing the Patient Experience registry. Patients were predominantly female (56%; 9,689/17,192), White (64%; 9,732/15,225), current/ex-smokers (80%; 13,784/17,192), and overweight/obese (69%; 11,628/16,849). The most commonly prescribed maintenance treatments were inhaled corticosteroid with a long-acting β

conclusionsOur findings highlight the high exacerbation, symptom, and treatment burdens experienced by COPD patients managed in US primary care, and the need for more real-life effectiveness trials to support decision making at the primary care level.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsFemaleHumansMalePatient CarePatient Outcome AssessmentPrimary Health CareRegistriesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsAPEXcharacterizationelectronic medical recordspatient reported outcomesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35879087
PMCPMC9328699
OpenAlexW4287733382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.