Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879085›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Communication Gaps Persist Between Primary Care and Specialist Physicians.

Lori Timmins, Lisa M Kern, Ann S O'Malley, Carol Urato, Arkadipta Ghosh, Eugene Rich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring primary care physician feedback following an integrative oncology consultation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perceptions of primary care services among Afro-Peruvians in Lima, Peru.Primary health care research & development · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Gaps in the coordination of care for people living with dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lori TimminsMathematica, Chicago, Illinois.
Lisa M KernWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Ann S O'MalleyMathematica, Washington, DC.
Carol UratoMathematica, Washington, DC.
Arkadipta GhoshMathematica, Princeton, New Jersey aghosh@mathematica-mpr.com.
Eugene RichMathematica, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A survey conducted with data from 2008 found that physicians often do not communicate with each other at the time of referral or after consultation. Communication between physicians might have improved since then, with the dissemination of electronic health records (EHRs), but this is not known. We used 2019 survey data to measure primary care physicians' perceptions of communication at the time of referral and after consultation. We found that large gaps in communication persist. The similarity between these survey results suggests that despite the dissemination of EHRs, physicians still do not consistently communicate with each other about the patients they share.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPhysicians, Primary CareCommunicationHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareReferral and Consultationphysician communicationprimary and specialty carereferral and consultation communication

Identifiers

PMID35879085
PMCPMC9328695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.