Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879011›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Effectiveness and active ingredients of social prescribing interventions targeting mental health: a systematic review.

Matthew Cooper, Leah Avery, Jason Scott, Kirsten Ashley, Cara Jordan, Linda Errington, Darren Flynn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Investigation of Epistemic Equity in Urban Green Space and Mental Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Outcomes and instruments used in social prescribing: a modified umbrella review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Assessing Unmet Social Needs in Multiple Sclerosis Care in Australia: A Qualitative Assessment of Feasibility, Barriers and Enablers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dementia, Travel, and Tourism: A Scoping Review.Dementia (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  16. Social Needs Screening Tools for Clinical Populations in Australia and New Zealand: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew CooperSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5915-2429
Leah AverySchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-1209
Jason ScottFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7031-2171
Kirsten AshleySchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Cara JordanSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Linda ErringtonSchool of Biomedical, Nutritional, and Sport Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Darren FlynnFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK darren.flynn@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7390-632X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to establish the effectiveness and active ingredients of UK-based social prescribing interventions targeting mental health and well-being outcomes.

designSystematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysies guidelines and a published protocol. DATA SOURCES: Nine databases were systematically searched up to March 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Social prescribing interventions in the UK involving adults aged ≥18 years, which reported on mental health outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data on study characteristics; outcomes; referral pathways; treatment fidelity strategies; person-centredness; intervention development processes and theory-linked behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Data were narratively synthesised.

results52 074 records were retrieved by the search, 13 interventions reported across 17 studies were included in this review (N=5036 participants at post-intervention). Fifteen studies were uncontrolled before-and-after designs, one a randomised controlled trial and one a matched groups design. The most frequently reported referral pathway was the link worker model (n=12), followed by direct referrals from community services (n=3). Participants were predominantly working age adults, and were referred for anxiety, depression, social isolation and loneliness. 16 out of 17 studies reported statistically significant improvements in outcomes (mental health, mental well-being, general health, or quality of life). Strategies to enhance treatment fidelity were suboptimal across studies. Only two studies used a specific theoretical framework. A few studies reported engaging service users in codesign (n=2) or usability and/or feasibility testing (n=4). Overall, 22 BCTs were coded across 13 interventions. The most frequently coded BCTs were social support-unspecified (n=11), credible source (n=7) and social support-practical (n=6).

conclusionsRobust conclusions on the effectiveness of social prescribing for mental health-related outcomes cannot be made. Future research would benefit from comprehensive intervention developmental processes, with reference to appropriate theory, alongside long-term follow-up outcome assessment, using treatment fidelity strategies and a focus on principle of person-centred care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020167887.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultBehavior TherapyHumansLonelinessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial IsolationMENTAL HEALTHPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID35879011
PMCPMC9328101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.