Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879008›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effectiveness of a specialist palliative home care nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference compared with usual care among patients with non-oncological palliative care needs: protocol for the multicentre KOPAL cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Gabriella Marx, Tina Mallon, Nadine Janis Pohontsch, Franziska Schade, Judith Dams, Manuel Zimansky, Thomas Asendorf, Silke Böttcher, Christiane A Mueller, Michael Freitag and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriella Marx *Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany g.marx@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-9518
Tina Mallon *Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-6377
Nadine Janis PohontschDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-4087
Franziska SchadeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.
Judith DamsDepartment of Health Economics and Health Care Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6922-434X
Manuel ZimanskyInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas AsendorfDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Silke BöttcherDivision of General Practice, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christiane A MuellerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-0884
Michael FreitagDivision of General Practice, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Eva HummersDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-6067
Hendrik van den BusscheDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ingmar SchäferDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-7478
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Care Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-6862
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Friedemann NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-7441
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProgressive chronic, non-malignant diseases (CNMD) like congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia are of growing relevance in primary care. Most of these patients suffer from severe symptoms, reduced quality of life and increased numbers of hospitalisations. Outpatient palliative care can help to reduce hospitalisation rate by up to 50%. Due to the complex medical conditions and prognostic uncertainty of the course of CNMD, early interprofessional care planning among general practitioners who provide general palliative care and specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams seems mandatory. The KOPAL study (a concept for strenghtening interprofessional collaboration for patients with palliative care needs) will test the effectiveness of a SPHC nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial KOPAL with usual care as control arm. The study is located in Northern Germany and aims to recruit 616 patients in 56 GP practices (because of pandemic reasons reduced to 191 participants). Randomisation will take place on GP practice level immediately after inclusion (intervention group/control group). Allocation concealment is carried out on confirmation of participation. Patients diagnosed with CHF (New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification 3-4), COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage classification 3-4, group D) or dementia GDS stage 4 or above). Primary outcome is a reduced hospital admission within 48 weeks after baseline, secondary outcomes include symptom burden, quality of life and health costs. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Intervention will be evaluated after the observation period using qualitative methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The responsible ethics committees of the cooperating centres approved the study. All steps of data collection, quality assurance and data analysis will continuously be monitored. The concept of KOPAL could serve as a blueprint for other regions and meet the challenges of geographical equity in end-of-life care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00017795; German Clinical Trials Register.

Indexed as

DementiaHeart FailureHome Care ServicesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChronic DiseaseHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPalliative CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationTelephoneChronic airways diseaseHeart failureINTERNAL MEDICINEPALLIATIVE CAREPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID35879008
PMCPMC9330329
OpenAlexW4287448752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.