Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878789›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

CoronaVac: A review of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

Lairun Jin, Zhuopei Li, Xiaoyin Zhang, Jingxin Li, Fengcai Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers During the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma Variant Outbreak in Manaus, Brazil.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The systemic capillary leak syndrome following COVID-19 vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lairun JinSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Zhuopei LiSchool of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Xiaoyin ZhangSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Jingxin LiNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Fengcai ZhuSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-0006
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSoutheast University · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CoronaVac, also known as the Sinovac inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has been widely implemented in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. We summarized the results of clinical trials and real-world studies of CoronaVac in this review. The overall efficacy for the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 (before the emergence of variants of concern) using two doses of 3 μg CoronaVac was 67.7% (95% CI, 35.9% to 83.7%). Effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths was more prominent than that in preventing COVID-19. A third dose inherited the effectiveness against non-variants of concern and increased effectiveness against severe COVID-19 outcomes caused by omicron variants compared to two doses. Most adverse reactions were mild. Few vaccine-related serious adverse reactions have been reported. Moreover, three-dose regimen significantly increased the seroconversion levels of neutralizing antibodies against omicron as compared to two-dose regimen. This review of CoronaVac may provide a scientific basis for optimizing global immunization strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccinePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, InactivatedCOVID-19immunogenicityinactivated vaccinesafetyvaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35878789
PMCPMC9746539
OpenAlexW4287834664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.