ArticleJournal of virological methods2022
An automated high-throughput enterovirus D68 microneutralization assay platform.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Virus neutralization assays, widely used to detect and quantify antibodies induced by virus infection, are considered the gold standard for enterovirus serology testing. Conventional microneutralization assays have been used to assess enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) seroprevalence. While manual or automated 96-well assays are valuable, higher-density assays that increase throughput provide the opportunity to more efficiently screen large, population-based serology collections, as well as to test sample sets against multiple virus strains on the same plate or within the same run. Here, automation was implemented for bulk reagent dispensing, serial dilutions, and luminescence measurement to develop a 384-well enterovirus microneutralization assay that increases overall testing throughput, maintains the reproducibility of the standard 96-well assay, and reduces sample volume usage. EV-D68 strains Fermon, 14-18953, and 18-23087 were used to evaluate the automated 384-well microneutralization assay and compare to the conventional 96-well assay. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using pooled human sera and positive and negative control antisera. The Lower Limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was the same as for the 96-well assay and coefficients of variations (CV) of 7.35 %, 5.97 %, and 2.85 % for the three EV-D68 strains respectively, were well below the typical goal of ≤ 20 % CV for accuracy. Z-factor analysis yielded results of 0.694, 0.638, and 0.852, for the three EV-D68 strains respectively, indicating a high level of precision, reliability, and robustness. Intra-assay (7.25 %) and inter-assay (7.12 %) variability were well below 20 % CV. Moreover, the 96-well and 384-well versions of the assay were highly concordant, with a 0.955 correlation coefficient in titers obtained for 50 sera tested. Validation of this automated 384-well microneutralization will support its use in large serology screens assessing the presence of EV-D68 neutralizing antibodies in human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.