Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878651›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2022

Blood pressure-lowering treatment for prevention of major cardiovascular diseases in people with and without type 2 diabetes: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.

Milad Nazarzadeh, Zeinab Bidel, Dexter Canoy, Emma Copland, Derrick A Bennett, Abbas Dehghan, George Davey Smith, Rury R Holman, Mark Woodward, Ajay Gupta and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Long-term effects of ipragliflozin on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the randomized PROTECT trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. 2024 Thai guidelines on the treatment of hypertension.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Milad NazarzadehDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Zeinab BidelDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dexter CanoyDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Emma CoplandDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Derrick A BennettNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abbas DehghanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, UK.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rury R HolmanDiabetes Trials Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ajay GuptaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Amanda I AdlerDiabetes Trials Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Malgorzata WamilDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
William C CushmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Koon TeoPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Barry R DavisUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
John ChalmersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carl J PepineDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kazem RahimiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, Medical Science Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: kazem.rahimi@wrh.ox.ac.uk.
Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Florida · USOxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USMRC Epidemiology Unit · GBPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUNSW Sydney · AUWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454British Heart Foundation FS/19/36/34346British Heart Foundation PG/18/65/33872Medical Research Council G0300622Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0801669Medical Research Council MC_PC_12027Medical Research Council MC_PC_12028Medical Research Council MC_PC_12029Medical Research Council MC_U137686849Medical Research Council MC_U137686854Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00017/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/6Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy exists as to whether the threshold for blood pressure-lowering treatment should differ between people with and without type 2 diabetes. We aimed to investigate the effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events by type 2 diabetes status, as well as by baseline levels of systolic blood pressure.

methodsWe conducted a one-stage individual participant-level data meta-analysis of major randomised controlled trials using the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration dataset. Trials with information on type 2 diabetes status at baseline were eligible if they compared blood pressure-lowering medications versus placebo or other classes of blood pressure-lowering medications, or an intensive versus a standard blood pressure-lowering strategy, and reported at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each group. Trials exclusively on participants with heart failure or with short-term therapies and acute myocardial infarction or other acute settings were excluded. We expressed treatment effect per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure on the risk of developing a major cardiovascular event as the primary outcome, defined as the first occurrence of fatal or non-fatal stroke or cerebrovascular disease, fatal or non-fatal ischaemic heart disease, or heart failure causing death or requiring hospitalisation. Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by trial, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) separately by type 2 diabetes status at baseline, with further stratification by baseline categories of systolic blood pressure (in 10 mm Hg increments from <120 mm Hg to ≥170 mm Hg). To estimate absolute risk reductions, we used a Poisson regression model over the follow-up duration. The effect of each of the five major blood pressure-lowering drug classes, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, β blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics, was estimated using a network meta-analysis framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018099283.

findingsWe included data from 51 randomised clinical trials published between 1981 and 2014 involving 358 533 participants (58% men), among whom 103 325 (29%) had known type 2 diabetes at baseline. The baseline mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure of those with and without type 2 diabetes was 149/84 mm Hg (SD 19/11) and 153/88 mm Hg (SD 21/12), respectively. Over 4·2 years median follow-up (IQR 3·0-5·0), a 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure decreased the risk of major cardiovascular events in both groups, but with a weaker relative treatment effect in participants with type 2 diabetes (HR 0·94 [95% CI 0·91-0·98]) compared with those without type 2 diabetes (0·89 [0·87-0·92]; p

interpretationAlthough the relative beneficial effects of blood pressure reduction on major cardiovascular events were weaker in participants with type 2 diabetes than in those without, absolute effects were similar. The difference in relative risk reduction was not related to the baseline blood pressure or allocation to different drug classes. Therefore, the adoption of differential blood pressure thresholds, intensities of blood pressure lowering, or drug classes used in people with and without type 2 diabetes is not warranted.

fundingBritish Heart Foundation, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Oxford Martin School.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Heart FailureHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35878651
PMCPMC9622419
OpenAlexW4286615932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.