ArticleThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2022
Blood pressure-lowering treatment for prevention of major cardiovascular diseases in people with and without type 2 diabetes: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.
Article in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- [Individualizing antihypertensive therapy in diabetes mellitus. Guidelines of the Austrian Diabetes Association (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Guideline
- Acupuncture-based interventions for blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk-related outcomes in adults with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Systolic blood pressure targets below 120 mm Hg are associated with reduced mortality: A meta-analysis.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- [Elevated blood pressure and hypertension : Focus of the 2024 ESC guidelines on risk reduction].Herz · 2025Guideline
- Blood pressure-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists for preventing of cardiovascular events and death in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta diabetologica · 2023Pooled it
- Three-Year Durability of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for the treatment of uncontrolled essential hypertension in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Healthy lifestyle factors and combined macrovascular and microvascular events in diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk: results from ADVANCE.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Long-term effects of ipragliflozin on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from the randomized PROTECT trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Trial
- Antihypertensive Medication Patterns in Patients with Hypertension that is Harder to Control: Insights from the EnligHTN Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Effects of Resistance Training on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Relationship Between Physical Activity Frequency and Cardiovascular Risk Throughout the Life Cycle.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health, genetic susceptibility, and incident cancer risk: a prospective UK biobank cohort and machine learning study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Relationship between blood pressure and adverse clinical events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): a retrospective analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- 2024 Thai guidelines on the treatment of hypertension.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- Global pattern, trend, and cross-country inequality of cardiovascular diseases caused by hypertension from 1990 to 2021, with projection from 2022 to 2060.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundControversy exists as to whether the threshold for blood pressure-lowering treatment should differ between people with and without type 2 diabetes. We aimed to investigate the effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events by type 2 diabetes status, as well as by baseline levels of systolic blood pressure.
methodsWe conducted a one-stage individual participant-level data meta-analysis of major randomised controlled trials using the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration dataset. Trials with information on type 2 diabetes status at baseline were eligible if they compared blood pressure-lowering medications versus placebo or other classes of blood pressure-lowering medications, or an intensive versus a standard blood pressure-lowering strategy, and reported at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each group. Trials exclusively on participants with heart failure or with short-term therapies and acute myocardial infarction or other acute settings were excluded. We expressed treatment effect per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure on the risk of developing a major cardiovascular event as the primary outcome, defined as the first occurrence of fatal or non-fatal stroke or cerebrovascular disease, fatal or non-fatal ischaemic heart disease, or heart failure causing death or requiring hospitalisation. Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by trial, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) separately by type 2 diabetes status at baseline, with further stratification by baseline categories of systolic blood pressure (in 10 mm Hg increments from <120 mm Hg to ≥170 mm Hg). To estimate absolute risk reductions, we used a Poisson regression model over the follow-up duration. The effect of each of the five major blood pressure-lowering drug classes, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, β blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics, was estimated using a network meta-analysis framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018099283.
findingsWe included data from 51 randomised clinical trials published between 1981 and 2014 involving 358 533 participants (58% men), among whom 103 325 (29%) had known type 2 diabetes at baseline. The baseline mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure of those with and without type 2 diabetes was 149/84 mm Hg (SD 19/11) and 153/88 mm Hg (SD 21/12), respectively. Over 4·2 years median follow-up (IQR 3·0-5·0), a 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure decreased the risk of major cardiovascular events in both groups, but with a weaker relative treatment effect in participants with type 2 diabetes (HR 0·94 [95% CI 0·91-0·98]) compared with those without type 2 diabetes (0·89 [0·87-0·92]; p
interpretationAlthough the relative beneficial effects of blood pressure reduction on major cardiovascular events were weaker in participants with type 2 diabetes than in those without, absolute effects were similar. The difference in relative risk reduction was not related to the baseline blood pressure or allocation to different drug classes. Therefore, the adoption of differential blood pressure thresholds, intensities of blood pressure lowering, or drug classes used in people with and without type 2 diabetes is not warranted.
fundingBritish Heart Foundation, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Oxford Martin School.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.