Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878383›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

External Ear Canal Evaluation in Dogs with Chronic Suppurative Otitis Externa: Comparison of Direct Cytology, Bacterial Culture and 16S Amplicon Profiling.

Caroline Leonard, Damien Thiry, Bernard Taminiau, Georges Daube, Jacques Fontaine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  15. Antimicrobial Activity ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline LeonardDepartment for Clinical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4342-5255
Damien ThiryBacteriology Laboratory, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, FARAH and Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-7364
Bernard TaminiauFundamental and Applied Research for Animal & Health (FARAH), Food Science Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine B43b, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Georges DaubeFundamental and Applied Research for Animal & Health (FARAH), Food Science Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine B43b, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9282-8408
Jacques FontaineDepartment for Clinical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2229-6637
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A discrepancy between cytology and bacterial culture methods is sometimes observed in canine otitis externa. The objective of this study was to compare results from cytology, bacterial culture and 16S amplicon profiling. Twenty samples from 16 dogs with chronic suppurative otitis externa were collected. A direct cytological evaluation was carried out during the consultations. Aerobic bacterial culture and susceptibility were performed by an external laboratory used in routine practice. For 16S amplicon profiling, DNA was extracted and the hypervariable segment V1−V3 of the 16S rDNA was amplified and then sequenced with a MiSeq Illumina sequence carried out by the Mothur software using the SILVA database. A good correlation between cytology and bacterial culture was observed in 60% of the samples. Some bacterial species revealed by bacterial culture were present with low relative abundance (<10%) in 16S amplicon profiling. Some bacterial species revealed by the 16S amplicon profiling analysis were not identified with culture; most of the time, the offending species was a Corynebacterium. To conclude, a careful interpretation of the results of bacterial culture should be made and always be in agreement with the cytology. The 16S amplicon profiling method appears to be a more sensitive method for detecting strains present in suppurative otitis but does not provide information on bacterial susceptibility.

Indexed as

16S amplicon profilingbacterial culturebacterial susceptibilitycaninesuppurative otitis externa

Identifiers

PMID35878383
PMCPMC9324598
OpenAlexW4285731082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.