Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878380›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Client-Owned Cats from Portugal.

Andreia Oliveira, Maria Aires Pereira, Teresa Letra Mateus, João R Mesquita, Helena Vala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Antibody-Based Survey ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andreia OliveiraEscola Superior Agrária de Ponte de Lima, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4990-706 Ponte de Lima, Portugal.
Maria Aires PereiraInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4054-9124
Teresa Letra MateusCISAS-Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-3012
João R MesquitaEpiUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), 4050-091 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-8103
Helena ValaInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-4867
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viseu · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

CECAV-AL4ANIMALS UIDB/CVT/00772/2020Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS) UIDB/00681/2020Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB) UIDB/04033/2020Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM) UID/04413/2020Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV) BiossAPESPCall2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The close contact between humans and domestic cats raises concerns about the potential risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Thus, this study aims to investigate anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in client-owned cats from Portugal and evaluate the infection risk of cats that maintain contact with human COVID-19 cases. A total of 176 cats, belonging to 94 households, were sampled. Cat owners answered an online questionnaire, and cats were screened for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 using a commercial ELISA. Twenty (21.3%) households reported at least one confirmed human COVID-19 case. Forty cats (22.7%) belonged to a COVID-19-positive and 136 (77.3%) to a COVID-19-negative household. The seroprevalences of cats from COVID-19-positive and -negative households were 5.0% (2/40) and 0.7% (1/136). The two SARS-CoV-2-seropositive cats from COVID-19-positive households had an indoor lifestyle, and their owners stated that they maintained a close and frequent contact with them, even after being diagnosed with COVID-19, pointing towards human-to-cat transmission. The SARS-CoV-2-seropositive cat from the COVID-19-negative household had a mixed indoor/outdoor lifestyle and chronic diseases. Owners of the three SARS-CoV-2-seropositive cats did not notice clinical signs or behavior changes. This study highlights the low risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from COVID-19-positive human household members to domestic cats, even in a context of close and frequent human-animal contact.

Indexed as

anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodiesCOVID-19householdhuman–animal interaction

Identifiers

PMID35878380
PMCPMC9315516
OpenAlexW4285732573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.