Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878291›Full record

ArticleToxics2022

Indoor Air Quality Considerations for Laboratory Animals in Wildfire-Impacted Regions-A Pilot Study.

Adam Schuller, Ethan S Walker, Jaclyn M Goodrich, Matthew Lundgren, Luke Montrose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam SchullerBiomolecular Sciences Graduate Program, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Ethan S WalkerCenter for Population Health Research, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4405-8568
Jaclyn M GoodrichDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8289-9253
Matthew LundgrenOffice of Research Compliance, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Luke MontroseDepartment of Public Health and Population Science, Boise State University, 1910 W University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Boise State University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

VPS35 D620N inhibits autophagy through disrupted hyaluronic acid-CD44 signalingP20GM109095 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OXFORD, JULIA THOM · 2014 to 2023
$22.7M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Wildfires and Cardiovascular Health: Evaluating Associations and Intervention StrategiesP20GM130418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI Curtis William Noonan · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109095NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM109095NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130418NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM130418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfire events are increasing across the globe. The smoke generated as a result of this changing fire landscape is potentially more toxic than air pollution from other ambient sources, according to recent studies. This is especially concerning for populations of humans or animals that live downwind of areas that burn frequently, given that ambient exposure to wildfire smoke cannot be easily eliminated. We hypothesized that a significant indoor air pollution risk existed for laboratory animal facilities located proximal to fire-prone areas. Here, we measured real time continuous outdoor and indoor air quality for 28 days at a laboratory animal facility located in the Rocky Mountain region. We demonstrated that during a wildfire event, the indoor air quality of this animal facility is influenced by ambient smoke events. The daily average indoor fine particulate matter value in an animal room exceeded the Environmental Protection Agency's ambient annual standard 14% of the time and exceeded the World Health Organization's ambient annual guideline 71% of the time. We further show that specialized cage filtration systems are capable of mitigating air pollution penetrance and could improve an animal's microenvironment. The potential effects for laboratory animal physiology that occur in response to the exposure levels and durations measured in this study remain to be determined; yet, even acute wildfire exposure events have been previously correlated with significant differences in gene regulatory and metabolic processes in vivo. We believe these findings warrant consideration for indoor laboratory animal facility air quality monitoring and development of smoke exposure prevention and response protocols, especially among facilities located downwind of fire-prone landscapes.

Indexed as

air qualitylab animalwildfire smoke

Identifiers

PMID35878291
PMCPMC9315628
OpenAlexW4285090333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.