Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878249›Full record

ArticleToxics2022

Development and In Vitro Validation of Antibacterial Paints Containing Chloroxylenol and Terpineol.

Micaela Machado Querido, Ivo Paulo, Sriram Hariharakrishnan, Daniel Rocha, Nuno Barbosa, Diogo Gonçalves, Rui Galhano Dos Santos, João Moura Bordado, João Paulo Teixeira, Cristiana Costa Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Micaela Machado QueridoEnvironmental Health Department, National Institute of Health, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0285-6972
Ivo PauloCERENA-Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0078-2180
Sriram HariharakrishnanCERENA-Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Daniel RochaBarbot-Indústria de Tintas, S.A., 4410-295 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0437-8265
Nuno BarbosaBarbot-Indústria de Tintas, S.A., 4410-295 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2535-4537
Diogo GonçalvesCERENA-Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
Rui Galhano Dos SantosCERENA-Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6738-0672
João Moura BordadoCERENA-Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal.
João Paulo TeixeiraEnvironmental Health Department, National Institute of Health, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-5250
Cristiana Costa PereiraEnvironmental Health Department, National Institute of Health, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-1223

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/130203/2017Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização-COMPETE2020/FEDER POCI-01-0247-FEDER-017875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment of self-disinfecting surfaces is an important method to avoid surface contamination. Recently, paints with antimicrobial properties have been developed to be applied on different surfaces, avoiding contamination with pathogens. In this work, self-disinfecting paints containing Chloroxylenol (CLX), Terpineol (TRP), and a mixture of both substances were developed. The goal was to evaluate and validate these paints using international standards for eventual commercialization and application in scenarios where surface contamination represents a problem. The paints were challenged with five different bacteria, Gram-positive and Gram-negative, before and after a scrub resistance test, where the long-term efficacy of the paints was evaluated. The antibacterial activity assessment was performed following ISO 22196 and JIS Z2801. In general, the paints showed very promising results, demonstrating their antibacterial activity, before and after scrub resistance test. The paint incorporating the mixture of CLX and TRP (CLX+TRP) stood out by revealing consistent results of antibacterial activity both before and after the scrub resistance test for most of the tested bacteria. The cytotoxicity of the developed paints was assessed in vitro by performing tests by direct contact with a human skin cell line, HaCaT, and testes on extracts with HaCaT and a pulmonary cell line, A549. The methodologies for cytotoxicity assessment were developed based in ISO 10993. For genotoxicity assessment, alkaline comet assay was conducted on both cell lines. The cytotoxicity assessment revealed promising results with the paints, demonstrating values of cellular viability above 70% and values of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage below 30%. The genotoxic assessment also revealed acceptable values of primary DNA damage for the developed antibacterial paints. In general, the selected methodologies presented good potential to be applied in the validation of both efficacy and safety of the antimicrobial paints, aiming to be applied in real scenarios.

Indexed as

antibacterialchloroxylenolcytotoxicitypaintterpineol

Identifiers

PMID35878249
PMCPMC9324826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.