Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878219›Full record

ArticleToxins2022

Evaluating Antivenom Efficacy against

Siddharth Bhatia, Avni Blotra, Karthikeyan Vasudevan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Snakebite envenoming in India: it is time we look beyond the concept of the Big Four species.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Review
  3. ExplainingToxins · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ImprovingF1000Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siddharth BhatiaCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Laboratory for the Conservation of Endangered Species, Hyderabad 500048, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6794-0257
Avni BlotraCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Laboratory for the Conservation of Endangered Species, Hyderabad 500048, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-1100
Karthikeyan VasudevanCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Laboratory for the Conservation of Endangered Species, Hyderabad 500048, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2316-3382
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In India, polyvalent antivenom is the mainstay treatment for snakebite envenoming. Due to batch-to-batch variation in antivenom production, manufacturers have to estimate its efficacy at each stage of IgG purification using the median effective dose which involves 100-120 mice for each batch. There is an urgent need to replace the excessive use of animals in snake antivenom production using in vitro alternatives. We tested the efficacy of a single batch of polyvalent antivenom from VINS bioproducts limited on

Indexed as

Snake BitesViperidaeAnimalsAntiveninsIndiaMicePhospholipases A2VenomsAntiveninsPhospholipases A2Venoms3Rsenvenomationin vitro assaysmedian effective dosepolyvalent antivenomSEC-HPLCsnakebitesvipers

Identifiers

PMID35878219
PMCPMC9322380
OpenAlexW4285393379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.