Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878146›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2022

When a Neglected Tropical Disease Goes Global: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Italian Physicians towards Monkeypox, Preliminary Results.

Matteo Riccò, Pietro Ferraro, Vincenzo Camisa, Elia Satta, Alessandro Zaniboni, Silvia Ranzieri, Antonio Baldassarre, Salvatore Zaffina, Federico Marchesi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo RiccòServizio di Prevenzione e Sicurezza Negli Ambienti di Lavoro (SPSAL), AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola n.2, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6525-2159
Pietro FerraroOccupational Medicine Unit, Direzione Sanità, Italian Railways' Infrastructure Division, RFI SpA, I-00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-1647
Vincenzo CamisaHealth Directorate, Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, I-00146 Rome, Italy.
Elia SattaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, I-43126 Parma, Italy.
Alessandro ZaniboniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, I-43126 Parma, Italy.
Silvia RanzieriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, I-43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8624
Antonio BaldassarreOccupational Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, I-50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-3570
Salvatore ZaffinaHealth Directorate, Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, I-00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-5423
Federico MarchesiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, I-43126 Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox (MPX) has been regarded as a neglected tropic disease of Western and Central Africa since the early 70s. However, during May 2022, an unprecedent outbreak of MPX has involved most of European Countries, as well as North and South America. While the actual extent of this outbreak is being assessed by health authorities, we performed a pilot study on specific knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in a sample of Italian medical professionals (24-30 May 2022; 10,293 potential recipients), focusing on Occupational Physicians (OP), Public Health Professionals (PH), and General Practitioners (GP), i.e., medical professionals more likely involved in the early management of incident cases. More specifically, we inquired into their attitude on the use of variola vaccine in order to prevent MPX infection. From a total of 566 questionnaire (response rate of 5.5%), 163 participants were included in the final analyses. Knowledge status was quite unsatisfying, with substantial knowledge gaps on all aspect of MPX. In turn, analysis of risk perception suggested a substantial overlooking of MPX as a pathogen, particularly when compared to SARS-CoV-2, TB, HIV, and HBV. Overall, 58.6% of respondents were somehow favorable to implement variola vaccination in order to prevent MPX, and the main effectors of this attitude were identified in having been previously vaccinated against seasonal influenza (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 6.443, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 1.798-23.093), and being favorable to receive variola vaccine (aOR 21.416; 95%CI 7.290-62.914). In summary, the significant extent of knowledge gaps and the erratic risk perception, associated collectively stress the importance of appropriate information campaigns among first-line medical professionals.

Indexed as

attitudesknowledgemonkeypox viruspracticessmallpoxvaccine hesitancyvariola

Identifiers

PMID35878146
PMCPMC9316880
OpenAlexW4285594771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.