Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878123›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Contributions of Trustworthiness, Health Literacy, and Self-Efficacy in Communicating With COVID-19 Vaccine-Hesitant Audiences: Web-Based Survey Study.

Sitara M Weerakoon, Mike Henson-Garcia, Melissa A Valerio-Shewmaker, Sarah E Messiah, Gregory Knell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sitara M WeerakoonCenter for Pediatric Population Health, School of Public Health and Children's Health System of Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas Campus, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-1950
Mike Henson-GarciaCenter for Pediatric Population Health, School of Public Health and Children's Health System of Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas Campus, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-9155
Melissa A Valerio-ShewmakerDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Brownsville Campus, Brownsville, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6563-0714
Sarah E MessiahCenter for Pediatric Population Health, School of Public Health and Children's Health System of Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas Campus, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-2175
Gregory KnellCenter for Pediatric Population Health, School of Public Health and Children's Health System of Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas Campus, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-544X
Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale health communication challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as widespread misinformation and distrust in health care professionals, have influenced reluctance to take the COVID-19 vaccine, also known as vaccine hesitancy. Trust in health professionals, adequate health literacy, and high self-efficacy are key components of actively pursuing preventative and protective health care measures. These factors may be associated with intentions to seek and complete a COVID-19 vaccine dosing.

objectiveThe objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

methodsIn February 2021, US adults (N=5872) responded to a web-based survey on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and components of health communication (trust in sources of health information, health literacy, and self-efficacy). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore associations between these factors and vaccine hesitancy while adjusting for key demographics. We hypothesized that low levels of trust, health literacy, and self-efficacy would be associated with increased vaccine hesitancy.

resultsThe adjusted odds of vaccine hesitancy was greater among those who placed little to no trust in health professionals compared to those who held a lot of trust (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.54, 95% CI 6.52-11.19). The odds of vaccine hesitancy was also greater among those who felt frustrated about finding health information compared to those who did not (AOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.62-2.70). Participants who had little to no confidence in receiving health advice or information had greater odds of vaccine hesitancy compared to those who had a lot of confidence (AOR 3.05, 95% CI 2.34-3.97).

conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of trust between health professionals and their patients, and a need for improving health literacy regarding vaccines. Perceptions of mistrust and low levels of health literacy were associated with high levels of vaccine hesitancy, providing empirical support of framing these factors as perceived barriers to vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 vaccine hesitancyhealth communicationhealth informationhealth literacyhealth professionalvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35878123
PMCPMC9345324
OpenAlexW4287884982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.