Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35878019›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

An analgesic peptide H-20 attenuates chronic pain via the PD-1 pathway with few adverse effects.

Long Zhao, Hao Luo, Yu Ma, Shengze Zhu, Yongjiang Wu, Muxing Lu, Xiaojun Yao, Xin Liu, Gang Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Establishment of a Magnetically Controlled Scalable Nerve Injury Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Long ZhaoCenter for Basic Medical Research, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-753X
Hao LuoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-9493
Yu MaKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and the Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-136X
Shengze ZhuCenter for Basic Medical Research, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-1812
Yongjiang WuCenter for Basic Medical Research, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2275-0788
Muxing LuCenter for Basic Medical Research, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-8195
Xiaojun YaoDr. Neher's Biophysics Laboratory for Innovative Drug Discovery, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6972-2971
Xin LiuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Institute of Polymer Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-1763
Gang ChenCenter for Basic Medical Research, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3669-5687
Nantong University · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MONankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of effective and safe analgesics for chronic pain management has been a health problem associated with people's livelihoods for many years. Analgesic peptides have recently shown significant therapeutic potential, as they are devoid of opioid-related adverse effects. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is widely expressed in neurons. Activation of PD-1 by PD-L1 modulates neuronal excitability and evokes significant analgesic effects, making it a promising target for pain treatment. However, the research and development of small molecule analgesic peptides targeting PD-1 have not been reported. Here, we screened the peptide H-20 using high-throughput screening. The in vitro data demonstrated that H-20 binds to PD-1 with micromolar affinity, evokes Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) phosphorylation, and diminishes nociceptive signals in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Preemptive treatment with H-20 effectively attenuates perceived pain in naïve WT mice. Spinal H-20 administration displayed effective and longer-lasting analgesia in multiple preclinical pain models with a reduction in or absence of tolerance, abuse liability, constipation, itch, and motor coordination impairment. In summary, our findings reveal that H-20 is a promising candidate drug that ameliorates chronic pain in the clinic.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsChronic PainPeptidesProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsGanglia, SpinalMiceAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidPeptidesProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoranalgesicchronic paindorsal root ganglionprogrammed cell death protein 1Src homology 2 domain–containing tyrosine phosphatase 1

Identifiers

PMID35878019
PMCPMC9351488
OpenAlexW4287838984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.