Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877915›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Partial Removal of Sugar from Apple Juice by Nanofiltration and Discontinuous Diafiltration.

Martina Gaglianò, Carmela Conidi, Giuseppina De Luca, Alfredo Cassano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martina GaglianòDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Technologies, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy.
Carmela ConidiInstitute on Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, Via P. Bucci, 17/C, 87036 Rende, Italy.
Giuseppina De LucaDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Technologies, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-2232
Alfredo CassanoInstitute on Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, Via P. Bucci, 17/C, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5919-2885

Funding

Calabria region, Italy FSE/FESR 2014-2020University of Calabria FSE/FESR 2014-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial removal of sugars in fruit juices without compromising their biofunctional properties represents a significant technological challenge. The current study was aimed at evaluating the separation of sugars from phenolic compounds in apple juice by using three different spiral-wound nanofiltration (NF) membranes with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) in the range of 200-500 Da. A combination of diafiltration and batch concentration processes was investigated to produce apple juice with reduced sugar content and improved health properties thanks to the preservation and concentration of phenolic compounds. For all selected membranes, permeate flux and recovery rate of glucose, fructose, and phenolic compounds, in both diafiltration and concentration processes, were evaluated. The concentration factor of target compounds as a function of the volume reduction factor (VRF) as well as the amount of adsorbed compound on the membrane surface from mass balance analysis were also evaluated. Among the investigated membranes a thin-film composite membrane with an MWCO of 200-300 Da provided the best results in terms of the preservation of phenolic compounds in the selected operating conditions. More than 70% of phenolic compounds were recovered in the retentate stream while the content of sugars was reduced by about 60%.

Indexed as

apple juicediafiltrationnanofiltrationsugar reductiontotal phenolic content (TPC)

Identifiers

PMID35877915
PMCPMC9323795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.