Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877662›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Anti-TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb): Comparison of two third generation automated immunoassays broadly used in clinical laboratories and results interpretation.

José María López Ortega, Pilar Salvador Martínez, Delia Acevedo-León, Núria Estañ Capell

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical Evaluation of a New Automated Bridge Assay for the Detection of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Autoantibodies.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management Aspects of Medical Therapy in Graves Disease.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José María López OrtegaAutoimmunity and Allergy Division, Clinical Laboratories, Dr. Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-6505
Pilar Salvador MartínezAutoimmunity and Allergy Division, Clinical Laboratories, Dr. Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Delia Acevedo-LeónHormones and Immunology Division, Clinical Laboratories, Dr. Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8070-374X
Núria Estañ CapellHormones and Immunology Division, Clinical Laboratories, Dr. Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graves' disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-replete populations. It is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the TSHR (TRAb). Although the diagnostic is mainly clinical, measuring TRAb improves accuracy and provides valuable prognostic information. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two of the most widely used immunoassays i.e., EliA™ anti-TSH-R and Elecsys® anti-TSH-R. We have carried out a comparative study measuring TRAb by the two immunoassays in consecutive sera samples referred to the laboratory for TRAb measurement. Autoantibodies were measured in all samples in parallel by the two techniques. The two techniques were highly concordant as demonstrated by a Cohen's kappa of 0.82. At the manufacturer recommended cut-off, sensitivity of Elecsys® TRAb test was higher (100% vs. 96.6%), while specificity of the EliA™ TRAb test was higher (99.4% vs. 95.3%). In most patients TRAb are detected by any of two tests which are both well suited for Clinical Laboratories use. However, a higher specificity may constitute an advantage for measurement used not for screening but for diagnostic purposes, as anti-TSH-R is.

Indexed as

Graves DiseaseLaboratories, ClinicalAutoantibodiesHumansImmunoassayReceptors, ThyrotropinAutoantibodiesReceptors, Thyrotropin

Identifiers

PMID35877662
PMCPMC9312426
OpenAlexW4287510221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.