Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Parent and child mental health during COVID-19 in Australia: The role of pet attachment.

Shannon K Bennetts, Sharinne B Crawford, Tiffani J Howell, Fiona Burgemeister, Catherine Chamberlain, Kylie Burke, Jan M Nicholson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Family Bonds with Pets and Mental Health during COVID-19 in Australia: A Complex Picture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon K BennettsJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3758-0398
Sharinne B CrawfordJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tiffani J HowellAnthrozoology Research Group, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Fiona BurgemeisterJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine ChamberlainJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kylie BurkeMetro North Mental Health, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jan M NicholsonJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUMurdoch University · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restrictions, social isolation, and uncertainty related to the global COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted the ways that parents and children maintain family routines, health, and wellbeing. Companion animals (pets) can be a critical source of comfort during traumatic experiences, although changes to family routines, such as those caused by COVID-19, can also bring about challenges like managing undesirable pet behaviours or pet-human interactions. We aimed to examine the relationship between pet attachment and mental health for both parents and their children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. A total of 1,034 parents living with a child under 18 years and a cat or dog completed an online cross-sectional survey between July and October 2020. Path analysis using multivariate linear regression was conducted to examine associations between objective COVID-19 impacts, subjective worry about COVID-19, human-pet attachment, and mental health. After adjusting for core demographic factors, stronger pet-child attachment was associated with greater child anxiety (parent-reported, p < .001). Parent-pet attachment was not associated with self-reported psychological distress (p = .42), however, parents who reported a strong emotional closeness with their pet reported greater psychological distress (p = .002). Findings highlight the role of pets during times of change and uncertainty. It is possible that families are turning to animals as a source of comfort, during a time when traditional social supports are less accessible. Alternatively, strong pet attachment is likely to reflect high levels of empathy, which might increase vulnerability to psychological distress. Longitudinal evidence is required to delineate the mechanisms underpinning pet attachment and mental health.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAnimalsChildCross-Sectional StudiesDogsHumansMental HealthPandemicsParents

Identifiers

PMID35877660
PMCPMC9312405
OpenAlexW4287577831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.