Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877647›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2022

Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.

Mitchell Doughty, Nilesh R Ghugre, Graham A Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Holo-Stroke-ii: Stroke care through stroke hologram teleportation- inpatient immersion.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing surgical navigation: a robust hand-eye calibration method for the Microsoft HoloLens 2.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Holo-Stroke: Assessing for Immersive Stroke Care Through Stroke Hologram Teleportation.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mitchell DoughtyDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7617-307X
Nilesh R GhugreDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Graham A WrightDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery program RGPIN-2019-06367New Frontiers in Research Fund Exploration NFRFE-2019-00333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of recent literature to understand the current challenges in the use of optical see-through head-mounted displays (OST-HMDs) for augmented reality (AR) assisted surgery. Using Google Scholar, 57 relevant articles from 1 January 2021 through 18 March 2022 were identified. Selected articles were then categorized based on a taxonomy that described the required components of an effective AR-based navigation system: data, processing, overlay, view, and validation. Our findings indicated a focus on orthopedic (n=20) and maxillofacial surgeries (n=8). For preoperative input data, computed tomography (CT) (n=34), and surface rendered models (n=39) were most commonly used to represent image information. Virtual content was commonly directly superimposed with the target site (n=47); this was achieved by surface tracking of fiducials (n=30), external tracking (n=16), or manual placement (n=11). Microsoft HoloLens devices (n=24 in 2021, n=7 in 2022) were the most frequently used OST-HMDs; gestures and/or voice (n=32) served as the preferred interaction paradigm. Though promising system accuracy in the order of 2-5 mm has been demonstrated in phantom models, several human factors and technical challenges-perception, ease of use, context, interaction, and occlusion-remain to be addressed prior to widespread adoption of OST-HMD led surgical navigation.

Indexed as

augmented realityhead-mounted displayshuman factorsmedical imagingsurgical navigation

Identifiers

PMID35877647
PMCPMC9318659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.