ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Practical Application of Augmented/Mixed Reality Technologies in Surgery of Abdominal Cancer Patients.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- More than meets the eye: Augmented reality in surgical oncology.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Application of the augmented reality tool VSI holomedicine for improved patient education before sinus surgery - a prospective randomised pilot study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- A review of head-mounted devices for surgical education, preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Orthopedic surgery assisted by mixed reality technology: systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Usefulness of Mixed Reality in Surgical Treatment: Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Immersive Virtual Reality for Enabling Patient Experience and Enrollment in Oncology Clinical Trials: A Feasibility Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Comparative outcomes of Palmer, Umbilical Veress needle, and open entry techniques in robotic-assisted surgery: a propensity-matched analysis of 9482 patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Augmented reality for external ventricular drain placement: Model alignment and integration software.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Exploration of the application of augmented reality technology for teaching spinal tumor's anatomy and surgical techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Experience in the Application of Augmented Reality Technology in the Surgical Treatment of Patients Suffering Primary and Recurrent Pelvic Tumors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The Multidomain Metaverse Cancer Care Digital Platform: Development and Usability Study.JMIR serious games · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The technology of augmented and mixed reality (AR/MR) is useful in various areas of modern surgery. We considered the use of augmented and mixed reality technologies as a method of preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in abdominal cancer patients. Practical use of AM/MR raises a range questions, which demand suitable solutions. The difficulties and obstacles we encountered in the practical use of AR/MR are presented, along with the ways we chose to overcome them. The most demonstrative case is covered in detail. The three-dimensional anatomical model obtained from the CT scan needed to be rigidly attached to the patient's body, and therefore an invasive approach was developed, using an orthopedic pin fixed to the pelvic bones. The pin is used both similarly to an X-ray contrast marker and as a marker for augmented reality. This solution made it possible, not only to visualize the anatomical structures of the patient and the border zone of the tumor, but also to change the position of the patient during the operation. In addition, a noninvasive (skin-based) marking method was developed that allows the application of mixed and augmented reality during operation. Both techniques were used (8 clinical cases) for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation, which allowed surgeons to verify the radicality of the operation, to have visual control of all anatomical structures near the zone of interest, and to reduce the time of surgical intervention, thereby reducing the complication rate and improving the rehabilitation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.