Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877623›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Easy-Ensemble Augmented-Shot-Y-Shaped Learning: State-of-the-Art Few-Shot Classification with Simple Components.

Yassir Bendou, Yuqing Hu, Raphael Lafargue, Giulia Lioi, Bastien Pasdeloup, Stéphane Pateux, Vincent Gripon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Few-Shot Learning Geometric Ensemble for Multi-label Classification of Chest X-Rays.Data augmentation, labelling, and imperfections : second MICCAI workshop, DALI 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. DALI (Workshop) (2nd : 2022 : Singapore) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yassir BendouIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7158-4451
Yuqing HuIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-1356
Raphael LafargueIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-5749
Giulia LioiIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8231-0886
Bastien PasdeloupIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8417-7537
Stéphane PateuxOrange Labs, 35510 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-7882
Vincent GriponIMT Atlantique, Technopole Brest Iroise, 29238 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-4542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few-shot classification aims at leveraging knowledge learned in a deep learning model, in order to obtain good classification performance on new problems, where only a few labeled samples per class are available. Recent years have seen a fair number of works in the field, each one introducing their own methodology. A frequent problem, though, is the use of suboptimally trained models as a first building block, leading to doubts about whether proposed approaches bring gains if applied to more sophisticated pretrained models. In this work, we propose a simple way to train such models, with the aim of reaching top performance on multiple standardized benchmarks in the field. This methodology offers a new baseline on which to propose (and fairly compare) new techniques or adapt existing ones.

Indexed as

ambiguityaugmentationsbackbonesclassificationcroppingdeep learningensemblingfew-shot learningself-supervision

Identifiers

PMID35877623
PMCPMC9324255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.