ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Arrhythmias and Heart Failure in Pregnancy: A Dialogue on Multidisciplinary Collaboration.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Future Perspectives of Obstetric Intensive Care Units in China.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025Article
- Hotspots and Frontiers in Arrhythmias During Pregnancy: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Antiarrhythmic Drug Use in Pregnancy: Considerations and Safety Profiles.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Burden from Study Questionnaire on Patient Fatigue in Qualitative Congestive Heart Failure Research.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- An Overview of Arrhythmias in Pregnancy.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
- Current status and future of cardio-obstetrics-review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Women's Cardiovascular Health: Prioritizing the Majority Minority.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of CVD in pregnant people is estimated to be around 1 to 4%, and it is imperative that clinicians that care for obstetric patients can promptly and accurately diagnose and manage common cardiovascular conditions as well as understand when to promptly refer to a high-risk obstetrics team for a multidisciplinary approach for managing more complex patients. In pregnant patients with CVD, arrhythmias and heart failure (HF) are the most common complications that arise. The difficulty in the management of these patients arises from variable degrees of severity of both arrhythmia and heart failure presentation. For example, arrhythmia-based complications in pregnancy can range from isolated premature ventricular contractions to life-threatening arrhythmias such as sustained ventricular tachycardia. HF also has variable manifestations in pregnant patients ranging from mild left ventricular impairment to patients with advanced heart failure with acute decompensated HF. In high-risk patients, a collaboration between the general obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, and cardiovascular teams (which may include cardio-obstetrics, electrophysiology, adult congenital, or advanced HF)-physicians, nurses and allied professionals-can provide the multidisciplinary approach necessary to properly risk-stratify these women and provide appropriate management to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.