Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877432›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2022

Virtual Screening of Repurposed Drugs as Potential Spike Protein Inhibitors of Different SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Molecular Docking Study.

Ahmad F Eweas, Hosam-Eldin H Osman, Ibrahim A Naguib, Mohammed A S Abourehab, Ahmed S Abdel-Moneim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the volatile metabolites of threeSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmad F EweasDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4626-6248
Hosam-Eldin H OsmanDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim A NaguibDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5923-1466
Mohammed A S AbourehabDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-6567
Ahmed S Abdel-MoneimDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3148-6782
Taif University · SARustaq College of Education · OMUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

Taif University Researchers Supporting Project under project number (TURSP-2020/116), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia TURSP-2020/116The Deanship of scientific research at Umm Al-Qua University for supporting this work by grant code 22UQU4290565DSR28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like most of the RNA viruses, SARS-CoV-2 continuously mutates. Although many mutations have an insignificant impact on the virus properties, mutations in the surface protein, especially those in the receptor-binding domain, may lead to immune or vaccine escape variants, or altered binding activities to both the cell receptor and the drugs targeting such a protein. The current study intended to assess the ability of different variants of interest (VOIs) and variants of concern (VOCs) of SARS-CoV-2 for their affinities of binding to different repurposed drugs. Seven FDA approved drugs, namely, camostat, nafamostat mesylate, fenofibrate, umifenovir, nelfinavir, cefoperazone and ceftazidime, were selected based on their reported in vitro and clinical activities against SARA-CoV-2. The S1 protein subunit from eleven different variants, including the latest highly contiguous omicron variant, were used as targets for the docking study. The docking results revealed that all tested drugs possess moderate to high binding energies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S1 protein for all different variants. Cefoperazone was found to possess the highest binding energy to the RBD of the S1 protein of all the eleven variants. Ceftazidime was the second-best drug in terms of binding affinity towards the S1 RBD of the investigated variants. On the other hand, fenofibrate showed the least binding affinity towards the RBD of the S1 protein of all eleven variants. The binding affinities of anti-spike drugs varied among different variants. Most of the interacting amino acid residues of the receptor fall within the RBD (438-506).

Indexed as

alphabetaCOVID-19deltaomicronSARS-CoV-2variantVOCVOI

Identifiers

PMID35877432
PMCPMC9319331
OpenAlexW4283792470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.