Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877232›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Molecular Differences between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Cervical Cancer Subtypes: Potential Prognostic Biomarkers.

Alma D Campos-Parra, Milagros Pérez-Quintanilla, Antonio Daniel Martínez-Gutierrez, Delia Pérez-Montiel, Jaime Coronel-Martínez, Oliver Millan-Catalan, David Cantú De León, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alma D Campos-ParraLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1750-5171
Milagros Pérez-QuintanillaUnidad de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Cancer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Antonio Daniel Martínez-GutierrezLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-5672
Delia Pérez-MontielDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Jaime Coronel-MartínezUnidad de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Cancer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Oliver Millan-CatalanLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-9324
David Cantú De LeónUnidad de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Cancer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Carlos Pérez-PlasenciaLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXAutonomous University of Tlaxcala · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most frequently diagnosed histological types of cervical cancer (CC) are squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC). Clinically, the prognosis of both types is controversial. A molecular profile that distinguishes each histological subtype and predicts the prognosis would be of great benefit to CC patients.

methodsThe transcriptome of CC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was analyzed using the DESeq2 package to obtain the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ADC and SCC. The DEGs were validated on a publicly available Mexican-Mestizo patient transcriptome dataset (GSE56303). The global biological pathways involving the DEGs were obtained using the Webgestalt platform. The associations of the DEGs with Overall Survival (OS) were assessed. Finally, three DEGs were validated by RT-qPCR in an independent cohort of Mexican patients.

resultsThe molecular profiles of ADC and SCC of the CC patients of the TCGA database and the Mexican-Mestizo cohort (GSE56303) were determined obtaining 1768 and 88 DEGs, respectively. Strikingly, 70 genes were concordant-with similar Log2FoldChange values-in both cohorts. The 70 DEGs were involved in IL-17, JAK/STAT, and Ras signaling. Kaplan-Meier OS analysis from the Mexican-Mestizo cohort showed that higher GABRB2 and TSPAN8 and lower TMEM40 expression were associated with better OS. Similar results were found in an independent Mexican cohort.

conclusionsMolecular differences were detected between the ADC and SCC subtypes; however, further studies are required to define the appropriate prognostic biomarker for each histological type.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkersFemaleHumansPrognosisTetraspaninsBiomarkersTetraspaninsTSPAN8 protein, humanadenocarcinomacervical cancersquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35877232
PMCPMC9322365
OpenAlexW4283808288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.