Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877224›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Evaluation of High b-Value Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Maxime Ablefoni, Jakob Leonhardi, Constantin Ehrengut, Matthias Mehdorn, Robert Sucher, Ines Gockel, Timm Denecke, Hans-Jonas Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxime AblefoniDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-1471
Jakob LeonhardiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Constantin EhrengutDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias MehdornDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Robert SucherDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Ines GockelDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7423-713X
Timm DeneckeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3313-3208
Hans-Jonas MeyerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-706X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few years, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become increasingly relevant in the diagnostic assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of high-b DWI (c-DWI) compared to standard DWI in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. A cohort of 40 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis were included in this retrospective study. DWI was performed with b-values of 50, 400, and 800 or 1000 s/mm² on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. C-DWI was calculated using a mono-exponential model with high b-values of 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 s/mm². All c-DWI images with high b-values were compared in terms of volume, detectability of peritoneal lesions, and image quality with the DWI sequence acquired with a b-value of 800 or 1000 s/mm² by two readers. In the group with a b-value of 800 s/mm², there was no statistically significant difference in terms of lesion volume. In the second group with a b-value of 1000 s/mm², peritoneal carcinomatosis lesions were statistically significantly larger than in the c-DWI with a- high b-value of 2000 s/mm² (median 7 cm³, range 1−26 cm³vs. median 6 cm³, range 1−83 cm³, p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a marked decrease in the detectability of peritoneal lesions starting at b = 2000 s/mm². In addition, image quality decreased noticeably from c-DWI at b = 3000 s/mm². In both groups, all images with high b-values at b = 4000 s/mm² and 5000 s/mm² were not diagnostically valuable due to poor image quality. The c-DWI technique offers good diagnostic performance without additional scanning time. High c-DWI b-values up to b = 1000 s/mm² provide comparable detectability of peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to standard DWI. Higher b-values over 1500 s/mm² result in lower image quality, which might lead to misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

Peritoneal NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiescomputed diffusion-weighted imaginghigh-b-valueperitoneal carcinomatosis

Identifiers

PMID35877224
PMCPMC9324469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.