Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877163›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Single-Session Interventions Embedded Within Tumblr: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility Study.

Mallory L Dobias, Robert R Morris, Jessica L Schleider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identifying the active ingredients of a behavioral activation-based digital single-session intervention targeting depression.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mallory L DobiasDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-3006
Robert R MorrisKoko, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5794-8490
Jessica L SchleiderDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-1953
Stony Brook University · USIndiana University Kokomo · US

Funding

Testing Scalable, Single-Session Interventions for Adolescent Depression in the context of COVID-19DP5OD028123 · OD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SCHLEIDER, JESSICA LEE · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Developing the Unified Protocol-Single Session Experience Platform for Adolescent Mental HealthR43MH128075 · NIMH · 3-C INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT · PI DEROSIER, MELISSA E., EHRENREICH-MAY, JILL · 2021 to 2021
$259k
NIH HHS DP5 OD028123NIMH NIH HHS R43 MH128075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting mental health treatments are insufficient for addressing mental health needs at scale, particularly for teenagers, who now seek mental health information and support on the web. Single-session interventions (SSIs) may be particularly well suited for dissemination as embedded web-based support options that are easily accessible on popular social platforms.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of three SSIs, each with a duration of 5 to 8 minutes (Project Action Brings Change, Project Stop Adolescent Violence Everywhere, and REFRAME)-embedded as Koko minicourses on Tumblr-to improve three key mental health outcomes: hopelessness, self-hate, and the desire to stop self-harm behavior.

methodsWe used quantitative data (ie, star ratings and SSI completion rates) to evaluate acceptability and short-term utility of all 3 SSIs. Paired 2-tailed t tests were used to assess changes in hopelessness, self-hate, and the desire to stop future self-harm from before to after the SSI. Where demographic information was available, the analyses were restricted to teenagers (13-19 years). Examples of positive and negative qualitative user feedback (ie, written text responses) were provided for each program.

resultsThe SSIs were completed 6179 times between March 2021 and February 2022. All 3 SSIs generated high star ratings (>4 out of 5 stars), with high completion rates (approximately 25%-57%) relative to real-world completion rates among other digital self-help interventions. Paired 2-tailed t tests detected significant pre-post reductions in hopelessness for those who completed Project Action Brings Change (P<.001, Cohen d

conclusionsVery brief SSIs, when embedded within popular social platforms, are one promising and acceptable method for providing free, scalable, and potentially helpful mental health support on the web. Considering the unique barriers to mental health treatment access that many teenagers face, this approach may be especially useful for teenagers without access to other mental health supports.

Indexed as

digital interventioninternet interventionmental healthsingle-session interventionweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID35877163
PMCPMC9361144
OpenAlexW4287377589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.