ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022
Large-Scale In Vitro and In Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screens Identify a 16-Gene Fitness Score for Improved Risk Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Comparison of the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus azacitidine versus D-CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Trial
- Advanced gene editing technologies for oncology mechanisms, applications, and clinical implementation.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Dissecting PCD-driven molecular landscapes in AML: a multi-omic framework for prognostication and therapeutic targeting.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Integration of transcriptomic data reveals lipid metabolic heterogeneity and identifies GSTO1 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prognostic heterogeneity in ASXL1-mutated AML and refinement by an immunophenotype-based score.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Precision prediction of venetoclax-azacitidine treatment efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia via integrative drug screening and machine learning.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted and epigenetic therapies for acute myeloid leukemia treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Establishment of a prognostic model based on ER stress-related cell death genes and proposing a novel combination therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Selective inhibition of TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition overcomes chemotherapy resistance in high-risk lung squamous cell carcinoma.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Elucidating AML ribosome biogenesis reshaping prognostic assessment and immune microenvironment integrated single-cell and bulk RNA analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Integrated multiomics analysis and machine learning refine neutrophil extracellular trap-related molecular subtypes and prognostic models for acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Deciphering cell states and the cellular ecosystem to improve risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Aging and comprehensive molecular profiling in acute myeloid leukemia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- A CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- NAD metabolism-related genes provide prognostic value and potential therapeutic insights for acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Identification of IKZF1 genetic mutations as new molecular subtypes in acute myeloid leukaemia.Clinical and translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe molecular complexity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presents a considerable challenge to implementation of clinical genetic testing for accurate risk stratification. Identification of better biomarkers therefore remains a high priority to enable improving established stratification and guiding risk-adapted therapy decisions. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe systematically integrated and analyzed the genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 data from more than 1,000 in vitro and in vivo knockout screens to identify the AML-specific fitness genes. A prognostic fitness score was developed using the sparse regression analysis in a training cohort of 618 cases and validated in five publicly available independent cohorts (n = 1,570) and our RJAML cohort (n = 157) with matched RNA sequencing and targeted gene sequencing performed.
resultsA total of 280 genes were identified as AML fitness genes and a 16-gene AML fitness (AFG16) score was further generated and displayed highly prognostic power in more than 2,300 patients with AML. The AFG16 score was able to distill downstream consequences of several genetic abnormalities and can substantially improve the European LeukemiaNet classification. The multi-omics data from the RJAML cohort further demonstrated its clinical applicability. Patients with high AFG16 scores had significantly poor response to induction chemotherapy. Ex vivo drug screening indicated that patients with high AFG16 scores were more sensitive to the cell-cycle inhibitors flavopiridol and SNS-032, and exhibited strongly activated cell-cycle signaling.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrated the utility of the AFG16 score as a powerful tool for better risk stratification and selecting patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy and alternative experimental therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.