ReviewJAMA neurology2022
Focal Cooling for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review.
Review in JAMA neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of third-generation antiseizure medications and non-invasive brain stimulation to treat refractory epilepsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Printing-Assisted Integration of Thermal, Fluidic and Electrical Components in Implants for Focal Brain Cooling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A near-infrared fluorescent probe for dynamic HClO monitoring in epilepsy and high-throughput discovery of natural neuroprotectants.Redox biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Epilepsy affects at least 1.2% of the population, with one-third of cases considered to be drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). For these cases, focal cooling therapy may be a potential avenue for treatment, offering hope to people with DRE for freedom from seizure. The therapy leverages neuroscience and engineering principles to deliver a reversible treatment unhindered by pharmacology. Observations: Analogous to (but safer than) the use of global cooling in postcardiac arrest and neonatal ischemic injury, extensive research supports the premise that focal cooling as a long-term treatment for epilepsy could be effective. The potential advantages of focal cooling are trifold: stopping epileptiform discharges, seizures, and status epilepticus safely across species (including humans). Conclusions and Relevance: This Review presents the most current evidence supporting focal cooling in epilepsy. Cooling has been demonstrated as a potentially safe and effective treatment modality for DRE, although it is not yet ready for use in humans outside of randomized clinical trials. The Review will also offer a brief overview of the technical challenges related to focal cooling in humans, including the optimal device design and cooling parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.