Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877074›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Clinical decision support improves blood culture collection before intravenous antibiotic administration in the emergency department.

Sayon Dutta, Dustin S McEvoy, David M Rubins, Anand S Dighe, Michael R Filbin, Chanu Rhee

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of information systems in emergency department decision-making-a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sayon DuttaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0381-6860
Dustin S McEvoyMass General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David M RubinsMass General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anand S DigheMass General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael R FilbinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chanu RheeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Developing Evidence-Based Sepsis Time Zero Criteria and Quality Metrics Using Electronic Health Record DataR01HS027170 · AHRQ · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI KLOMPAS, MICHAEL, RHEE, CHANU · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurviving Sepsis guidelines recommend blood cultures before administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for patients with sepsis or moderate to high risk of bacteremia. Clinical decision support (CDS) that reminds emergency department (ED) providers to obtain blood cultures when ordering IV antibiotics may lead to improvements in this process measure.

methodsThis was a multicenter causal impact analysis comparing timely blood culture collections prior to IV antibiotics for adult ED patients 1 year before and after a CDS intervention implementation in the electronic health record. A Bayesian structured time-series model compared daily timely blood cultures collected compared to a forecasted synthetic control. Mixed effects models evaluated the impact of the intervention controlling for confounders.

resultsThe analysis included 54 538 patients over 2 years. In the baseline phase, 46.1% had blood cultures prior to IV antibiotics, compared to 58.8% after the intervention. Causal impact analysis determined an absolute increase of 13.1% (95% CI 10.4-15.7%) of timely blood culture collections overall, although the difference in patients with a sepsis diagnosis or who met CDC Adult Sepsis Event criteria was not significant, absolute difference 8.0% (95% CI -0.2 to 15.8). Blood culture positivity increased in the intervention phase, and contamination rates were similar in both study phases. DISCUSSION: CDS improved blood culture collection before IV antibiotics in the ED, without increasing overutilization.

conclusionA simple CDS alert increased timely blood culture collections in ED patients for whom concern for infection was high enough to warrant IV antibiotics.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalSepsisAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBayes TheoremBlood CultureEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic stewardshipclinical decision supportemergency medicinesepsis

Identifiers

PMID35877074
PMCPMC9471721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.