Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35877020›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022

Pulmonary nodule segmentation based on REMU-Net.

Dongjie Li, Shanliang Yuan, Gang Yao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongjie LiHeilongjiang Key Laboratory of Complex Intelligent System and Integration, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150040, China. dongjieli2013@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2506-1507
Shanliang YuanHeilongjiang Key Laboratory of Complex Intelligent System and Integration, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150040, China.
Gang YaoHeilongjiang Atomic Energy Research Institute, Harbin, 150086, China.

Funding

Basic Applied Technology of Heilongjiang Institutes Research Special Project ZNJZ2020WL01Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation LH2019F024National Natural Science Foundation of China 51975170Youth Innovation Fund of Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences CXJQ2020WL01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, U-Net has shown excellent performance in medical image segmentation, but it cannot accurately segment nodules of smaller size when segmenting pulmonary nodules. To make it more accurate to segment pulmonary nodules in CT images, U-Net is improved to REMU-Net. First, ResNeSt, which is the state-of-the-art ResNet variant, is used as the backbone of the U-Net, and a spatial attention module is introduced into the Split-Attention block of ResNeSt to enable the network to extract more diverse and efficient features. Secondly, a feature enhancement module based on the atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) is introduced in the U-Net, which is utilized to obtain more abundant context information. Finally, replacing the skip connection of the U-Net with a multi-scale skip connection overcomes the limitation that the decoder subnet can only accept same-scale feature information. Experiments show that REMU-Net has a Dice score of 84.76% on the LIDC-IDRI dataset. The network has better segmentation performance than most other existing U-Net improvement networks.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesAttentionHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPyramidal TractsDeep learningPulmonary nodulesSegmentationU-Net

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.