Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35876968›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2022

Task-unrelated thought increases after consumption of COVID-19 and general news.

Chelsie M Hart, Caitlin Mills, Raela F Thiemann, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen, Julia W Y Kam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chelsie M HartDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. chelsie.hart@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7066-7316
Caitlin MillsDepartment of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, 15 Academic Way, Durham, NH, 03824, USA.
Raela F ThiemannDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Jessica R Andrews-HannaDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Science, University of Arizona, 1503 E University Blvd, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Lianne Tomfohr-MadsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Julia W Y KamDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. julia.kam@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs) are frequent distractions from our everyday tasks, which can reduce productivity and safety during task performance. This necessitates the examination of factors that modulate TUT occurrence in daily life. One factor that has previously been implicated as a source of TUT is personally salient concerns. External factors such as news media serve as cues for these concerns, potentially increasing TUT occurrence. However, this has not been thoroughly examined in everyday life settings. We thus utilized Ecological Momentary Assessment to survey participants throughout the day for ten days, on their TUTs and news consumption in two separate studies. Study 1 focused on the impact of news related to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as a common and global concern. We found that TUT occurrence was significantly predicted by COVID-19 news consumption, such that TUT occurrence increased with COVID-19 news consumption. To extend these findings, we implemented Study 2 using similar methods, but focusing on the consumption of news media in general. TUT occurrence was predicted by general news consumption, with an increase in reports of TUT following consumption of news media in general. We thus extended the association found between TUT and COVID-19-related news in Study 1, to any news topic in Study 2. We speculate that the increase in TUTs was due to heightened salience of current concerns, cued by the news. These findings highlight the importance of considering when we choose to consume news media and the value of examining contextual factors when studying TUTs in daily life.

Indexed as

AttentionCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and AnalysisCoronavirusEcological momentary assessmentNewsTask-unrelated thought

Identifiers

PMID35876968
PMCPMC9309453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.