Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35876889›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2022

An artificial intelligence approach for predicting cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline.

Wei-Ting Chang, Chung-Feng Liu, Yin-Hsun Feng, Chia-Te Liao, Jhi-Joung Wang, Zhih-Cherng Chen, Hsiang-Chun Lee, Jhih-Yuan Shih

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Augmenting Electronic Health Records for Adverse Event Detection.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Ting ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, 901, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Chung-Feng LiuDepartment of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Yin-Hsun FengDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Chia-Te LiaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, 901, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Jhi-Joung WangDepartment of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Zhih-Cherng ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, 901, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsiang-Chun Lee *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan, ROC.
Jhih-Yuan Shih *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Zhonghua Road, Yongkang District, 901, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC. cmcvecho@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3160-1143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although anti-cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity is known, until now it lacks a reliable risk predictive model of the subsequent cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline therapy. An artificial intelligence (AI) with a machine learning approach has yet to be applied in cardio-oncology. Herein, we aimed to establish a predictive model for differentiating patients at a high risk of developing cardiotoxicity, including cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) and symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This prospective single-center study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were preparing for anthracycline therapy from 2014 to 2018. We randomized the patients into a 70%/30% split group for ML model training and testing. We used 15 variables, including clinical, chemotherapy, and echocardiographic parameters, to construct a random forest model to predict CTRCD and heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) during the 3-year follow-up period (median, 30 months). Comparisons of the predictive accuracies among the random forest, logistic regression, support-vector clustering (SVC), LightGBM, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models were also performed. Notably, predicting CTRCD using the MLP model showed the best accuracy compared with the logistic regression, random forest, SVC, LightGBM, and KNN models. The areas under the curves (AUC) of MLP achieved 0.66 with the sensitivity and specificity as 0.86 and 0.53, respectively. Notably, among the features, the use of trastuzumab, hypertension, and anthracycline dose were the major determinants for the development of CTRCD in the logistic regression. Similarly, MLP, logistic regression, and SVM also showed higher AUCs for predicting the development of HFrEF. We also validated the AI prediction model with an additional set of patients developing HFrEF, and MLP presented an AUC of 0.81. Collectively, an AI prediction model is promising for facilitating physicians to predict CTRCD and HFrEF in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline therapy. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its impact in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHeart DiseasesHeart FailureAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticArtificial IntelligenceCardiotoxicityFemaleHumansProspective StudiesStroke VolumeAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnthracyclineArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerMACCEsMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.