Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35876574›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

ATP Bioluminescence Assay To Evaluate Antibiotic Combinations against Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Berta Puig-Collderram, Sandra Domene-Ochoa, Maria Salvà-Comas, Maria Milagro Montero, Xavier Duran, Juan R González, Santiago Grau, Antonio Oliver, Juan P Horcajada, Eduardo Padilla and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Berta Puig-CollderramLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Sandra Domene-OchoaInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Salvà-ComasLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Milagro MonteroInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier DuranInstitut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Juan R GonzálezBarcelona Institute for Global Health, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago GrauInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio OliverService of Microbiology, Hospital Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9327-1894
Juan P HorcajadaInfectious Diseases Service, Hospital del Mar, Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-5459
Eduardo PadillaLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Concepción SeguraLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0236-9464
Núria PrimLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital del Mar Research Institute · ESHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESHospital Del Mar · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-kill curves are used to study antibiotic combinations, but the colony count method to obtain the results is time-consuming. The aim of the study was to validate an ATP assay as an alternative to the conventional colony count method in studies of antibiotic combinations. The cutoff point for synergy and bactericidal effect to categorize the results using this alternative method were determined in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The ATP assay was performed using the GloMax 96 microplate luminometer (Promega), which measures bioluminescence in relative light units (RLU). To standardize this assay, background, linearity, and the detection limit were determined with one strain each of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Twenty-four-hour time-kill curves were performed in parallel by both methods with 12 strains of P. aeruginosa. The conventional method was used as a "gold" standard to establish the pharmacodynamic cutoff points in the ATP method. Normal saline solution was established as washing/dilution medium. RLU signal correlated with CFU when the assay was performed within the linear range. The categorization of the pharmacodynamic parameters using the ATP assay was equivalent to that of the colony count method. The bactericidal effect and synergy cutoff points were 1.348 (93% sensitivity, 81% specificity) and 1.065 (95% sensitivity, 89% specificity) log RLU/mL, respectively. The ATP assay was useful to determine the effectiveness of antibiotic combinations in time-kill curves. This method, less laborious and faster than the colony count method, could be implemented in the clinical laboratory workflow.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic combinationATPbioluminescenceluminometerPseudomonas aeruginosasynergy

Identifiers

PMID35876574
PMCPMC9431428
OpenAlexW4287377785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.