Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35876500›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2022

Sensitivity of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Through Time.

Rachelle N Binny, Patricia Priest, Nigel P French, Matthew Parry, Audrey Lustig, Shaun C Hendy, Oliver J Maclaren, Kannan M Ridings, Nicholas Steyn, Giorgia Vattiato and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Streptavidin-DisplayingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachelle N BinnyManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3433-0417
Patricia PriestDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-6236
Nigel P FrenchTāwharau Ora/School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerson North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6334-0657
Matthew ParryTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-0219
Audrey LustigManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0869-3847
Shaun C HendyTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-6517
Oliver J MaclarenDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-4539
Kannan M RidingsTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8801-4428
Nicholas SteynTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-2941
Giorgia VattiatoTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-7541
Michael J PlankTe Pūnaha Matatini, Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-3465
University of Auckland · NZTe Pūnaha MatatiniMassey University · NZUniversity of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are the gold standard for detecting recent infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Reverse transcription PCR sensitivity varies over the course of an individual's infection, related to changes in viral load. Differences in testing methods, and individual-level variables such as age, may also affect sensitivity.

methodsUsing data from New Zealand, we estimate the time-varying sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR under varying temporal, biological, and demographic factors.

resultsSensitivity peaks 4-5 days postinfection at 92.7% (91.4%-94.0%) and remains over 88% between 5 and 14 days postinfection. After the peak, sensitivity declined more rapidly in vaccinated cases compared with unvaccinated, females compared with males, those aged under 40 compared with over 40s, and Pacific peoples compared with other ethnicities.

conclusionsReverse transcription PCR remains a sensitive technique and has been an effective tool in New Zealand's border and postborder measures to control coronavirus disease 2019. Our results inform model parameters and decisions concerning routine testing frequency.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AgedClinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse TranscriptionSensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19reversetranscriptionpolymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2surveillancetest sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID35876500
PMCPMC9384503
OpenAlexW4287378331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.