Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35876281›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Replicability in cancer omics data analysis: measures and empirical explorations.

Jiping Wang, Hongmin Liang, Qingzhao Zhang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Selective Review of Network Analysis Methods for Gene Expression Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiping WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hongmin LiangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Qingzhao ZhangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999

Funding

Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RUTH HALABAN · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer (YSILC): The Biology and Personalized Treatment of Lung CancerP50CA196530 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kurt A Schalper · 2015 to 2026
$31.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biomedical research, the replicability of findings across studies is highly desired. In this study, we focus on cancer omics data, for which the examination of replicability has been mostly focused on important omics variables identified in different studies. In published literature, although there have been extensive attention and ad hoc discussions, there is insufficient quantitative research looking into replicability measures and their properties. The goal of this study is to fill this important knowledge gap. In particular, we consider three sensible replicability measures, for which we examine distributional properties and develop a way of making inference. Applying them to three The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets reveals in general low replicability and significant across-data variations. To further comprehend such findings, we resort to simulation, which confirms the validity of the findings with the TCGA data and further informs the dependence of replicability on signal level (or equivalently sample size). Overall, this study can advance our understanding of replicability for cancer omics and other studies that have identification as a key goal.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeoplasmsHumansSample Sizecancer omics data analysisquantitative propertiesreplicability measure

Identifiers

PMID35876281
PMCPMC9487717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.