Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875787›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Human Gait Analysis: A Sequential Framework of Lightweight Deep Learning and Improved Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm.

Muhammad Attique Khan, Habiba Arshad, Robertas Damaševičius, Abdullah Alqahtani, Shtwai Alsubai, Adel Binbusayyis, Yunyoung Nam, Byeong-Gwon Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University, Taxila, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-0715
Habiba ArshadDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan.
Robertas DamaševičiusDepartment of Software Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Abdullah AlqahtaniCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Shtwai AlsubaiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Adel BinbusayyisCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Yunyoung NamDepartment of ICT Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-9394
Byeong-Gwon KangDepartment of ICT Convergence, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-2308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human gait recognition has emerged as a branch of biometric identification in the last decade, focusing on individuals based on several characteristics such as movement, time, and clothing. It is also great for video surveillance applications. The main issue with these techniques is the loss of accuracy and time caused by traditional feature extraction and classification. With advances in deep learning for a variety of applications, particularly video surveillance and biometrics, we proposed a lightweight deep learning method for human gait recognition in this work. The proposed method includes sequential steps-pretrained deep models selection of features classification. Two lightweight pretrained models are initially considered and fine-tuned in terms of additional layers and freezing some middle layers. Following that, models were trained using deep transfer learning, and features were engineered on fully connected and average pooling layers. The fusion is performed using discriminant correlation analysis, which is then optimized using an improved moth-flame optimization algorithm. For final classification, the final optimum features are classified using an extreme learning machine (ELM). The experiments were carried out on two publicly available datasets, CASIA B and TUM GAID, and yielded an average accuracy of 91.20 and 98.60%, respectively. When compared to recent state-of-the-art techniques, the proposed method is found to be more accurate.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMothsAlgorithmsAnimalsGaitHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35875787
PMCPMC9303119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.