ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Genetic Optimization Algorithm in Financial Portfolio Problem.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An enhanced genetic algorithm solution for itinerary recommendation considering various constraints.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to address the application of genetic optimization algorithms to financial investment portfolio issues, the optimal allocation rate must be high and the risk is low. This paper uses quadratic programming algorithms and genetic algorithms as well as quadratic programming algorithms, Matlab planning solutions for genetic algorithms, and genetic algorithm toolboxes to solve Markowitz's mean variance model. The mathematical model for introducing sparse portfolio strategies uses the decomposition method of penalty functions as an algorithm for solving nonconvex sparse optimization strategies to solve financial portfolio problems. The merging speed of the quadratic programming algorithm is fast, and the merging speed depends on the selection of the initial value. The genetic algorithm performs very well in global searches, but local search capabilities are insufficient and the pace of integration into the next stage is slow. To solve this, using a genetic algorithm toolbox is quick and easy. The results of the experiments show that the final solution of the decomposition method of the fine function is consistent with the solution of the integrity of the genetic algorithm. 67% of the total funds will be spent on local car reserves and 33% on wine reserves. When data scales are small, quadratic programming algorithms and genetic algorithms can provide effective portfolio feedback, and the method of breaking down penalty functions to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of algorithm combinations is widely used in sparse financial portfolio issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.