ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Machine Learning and Information Coverage Centralized Genetic Method in Safety Management of Football Training.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Application of Machine Learning and Information Coverage Centralized Genetic Method in Safety Management of Football Training.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-09Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/22758AB704BE7874D39C0FAFC5B63D
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, China's competitive sports have developed rapidly. Among them, football is a sport with high energy consumption, high intensity, strong antagonism, and high speed. As a result, injuries are common in football practice. It is impossible to do adequate football training in order to avoid such incidents. At the moment, football injury incidents are common, severely limiting the full growth of the sport in China. This work investigates the safety management of football training using machine learning and an information coverage-centralized genetic technique. To begin, this article describes in detail the machine learning and information coverage-centralized genetic algorithm, summarizes the classification of machine learning models, and introduces the verification and evaluation process of machine learning models and trusted information coverage models as an important theoretical basis for football training safety management. Then, the genetic algorithm based on information coverage concentration is used in football training to analyze the safety risk of football training and the analysis of training speed type. The results show that the human factor accounts for the highest proportion in football training safety accidents, accounting for 28.75%. In the analysis of football training speed, the average passing time of medium strength accounts for the highest proportion of 39.75%. In football training, in order to ensure the safety of training, the combination of medium strength and high strength can be adopted to avoid training injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.