Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875691›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Targeting protein arginine methyltransferase 5 sensitizes glioblastoma to trametinib.

Yeshavanth Kumar Banasavadi-Siddegowda, Sriya Namagiri, Yoshihiro Otani, Hannah Sur, Sarah Rivas, Jean-Paul Bryant, Allison Shellbourn, Mitchell Rock, Ashis Chowdhury, Cole T Lewis and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploiting Synthetic Lethality of PRMT5 for Precision Treatment of MTAP-Deficient Glioblastoma.International journal of translational medicine (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. MEK Inhibition in Glioblastoma: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yeshavanth Kumar Banasavadi-SiddegowdaSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sriya NamagiriSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yoshihiro OtaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hannah SurSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sarah RivasSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jean-Paul BryantSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Allison ShellbournSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mitchell RockSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ashis ChowdhurySurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cole T LewisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Toshihiko ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Stuart WalbridgeSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sivarajan KumarasamyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences Diabetes Institute, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Ashish H ShahSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tae Jin LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dragan MaricFlow and Imaging Cytometry Core Facility, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yuanqing YanDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ji Young YooDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sangamesh G KumbarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
John D HeissSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Balveen KaurDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USNational Institutes of Health · USNorthwestern University · USOhio University · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Molecular Pathogenesis of NeoplasiaZIANS003052 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HEISS, JOHN · 2009 to 2025
$20.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains dismal because therapeutic approaches have limited effectiveness. A new targeted treatment using MEK inhibitors, including trametinib, has been proposed to improve GBM therapy. Trametinib had a promising preclinical effect against several cancers, but its adaptive treatment resistance precluded its clinical translation in GBM. Previously, we have demonstrated that protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is upregulated in GBM and its inhibition promotes apoptosis and senescence in differentiated and stem-like tumor cells, respectively. We tested whether inhibition of PRMT5 can enhance the efficacy of trametinib against GBM. Methods: Patient-derived primary GBM neurospheres (GBMNS) with transient PRMT5 knockdown were treated with trametinib and cell viability, proliferation, cell cycle progression, ELISA, and western blot were analyzed. In vivo, NSG mice were intracranially implanted with PRMT5-intact and -depleted GBMNS, treated with trametinib by daily oral gavage, and observed for tumor progression and mice survival rate. Results: PRMT5 depletion enhanced trametinib-induced cytotoxicity in GBMNS. PRMT5 knockdown significantly decreased trametinib-induced AKT and ERBB3 escape pathways. However, ERBB3 inhibition alone failed to block trametinib-induced AKT activity suggesting that the enhanced antitumor effect imparted by PRMT5 knockdown in trametinib-treated GBMNS resulted from AKT inhibition and not ERBB3 inhibition. In orthotopic murine xenograft models, PRMT5-depletion extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice, and combination with trametinib further increased survival. Conclusion: Combined PRMT5/MEK inhibition synergistically inhibited GBM in animal models and is a promising strategy for GBM therapy.

Indexed as

AKTERBB3glioblastomaPRMT5trametinib

Identifiers

PMID35875691
PMCPMC9297944
OpenAlexW4283213065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.