Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875681›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2022

Chemical approaches to cryopreservation.

Kathryn A Murray, Matthew I Gibson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
61.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Intracellular Delivery of Hydrophilic Glycans Using Superchaotropic Clusters.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Lessons From Drug Discovery for Cryoprotective Agent Design: An AI-Oriented Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Cryopreservative Bioink Enables Direct Bioprinting of Adherent Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn A MurrayDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Matthew I GibsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-1278
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

European Research Council 866056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation of cells and biologics underpins all biomedical research from routine sample storage to emerging cell-based therapies, as well as ensuring cell banks provide authenticated, stable and consistent cell products. This field began with the discovery and wide adoption of glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide as cryoprotectants over 60 years ago, but these tools do not work for all cells and are not ideal for all workflows. In this Review, we highlight and critically review the approaches to discover, and apply, new chemical tools for cryopreservation. We summarize the key (and complex) damage pathways during cellular cryopreservation and how each can be addressed. Bio-inspired approaches, such as those based on extremophiles, are also discussed. We describe both small-molecule-based and macromolecular-based strategies, including ice binders, ice nucleators, ice nucleation inhibitors and emerging materials whose exact mechanism has yet to be understood. Finally, looking towards the future of the field, the application of bottom-up molecular modelling, library-based discovery approaches and materials science tools, which are set to transform cryopreservation strategies, are also included.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsChemical biology

Identifiers

PMID35875681
PMCPMC9294745
OpenAlexW4285730790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.