ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Self-optimizing neural network in the classification of real valued data.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classification of multi-dimensional patterns is one of the most popular and often most challenging problems of machine learning. That is why some new approaches are being tried, expected to improve existing ones. The article proposes a new technique based on the decision network called self-optimizing neural networks (SONN). The proposed approach works on discretized data. Using a special procedure, we assign a feature vector to each element of the real-valued dataset. Later the feature vectors are analyzed, and decision patterns are created using so-called discriminants. We focus on how these discriminants are used and influence the final classifier prediction. Moreover, we also discuss the influence of the neighborhood topology. In the article, we use three different datasets with different properties. All results obtained by derived methods are compared with those obtained with the well-known support vector machine (SVM) approach. The results prove that the proposed solutions give better results than SVM. We can see that the information obtained from a training set is better generalized, and the final accuracy of the classifier is higher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.