Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875621›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2022

The concept of recovery kinetics: an observational study of continuous post-operative monitoring in spine surgery.

Monish Maharaj, Pragadesh Natarajan, R Dineth Fonseka, Sukrit Khanna, Wen Jie Choy, Kaitlin Rooke, Kevin Phan, Ralph Jasper Mobbs

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multidomain postoperative recovery trajectories after lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monish MaharajFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Pragadesh NatarajanFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
R Dineth FonsekaFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sukrit KhannaFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Wen Jie ChoyFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Kaitlin RookeNeuroSpine Clinic, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kevin PhanNeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Sydney, Australia.
Ralph Jasper MobbsFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The spine surgeon's understanding of an individual patient's burden of disease and functional disability in daily life is shaped by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Although PROMs are useful in understanding the patient's perception of their disease, the use of PROMs constitutes a "snapshot" approach of single timepoint data capture, omitting day-to-day fluctuations in functional status. We introduce the concept of kinetics when considering continuous and objective postoperative patient monitoring with wearable sensors. Methods: A prospective single-centre series was performed using patients either undergoing lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (n=12), or posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=12). The Oswestry Disability Index (PROM) was conducted preoperatively and 12-weeks postoperatively. During this timeframe, continuous measurements of step count and distance travelled were made using a wrist-based wearable accelerometer. Results: Over the 12-week study period, mean daily step count for all participants improved from 4,700 to 7,700 steps per day (P=0.013), following an initial dip in total steps taken. The mean daily distance travelled improved from 3,300 to 5,300 meters per day (P=0.003). Decompression group recovered at a faster rate than the fusion group. Conclusions: Although overall improvement was similar between the decompression and fusion groups, the recovery kinetics varied. The recovery kinetics approach of continuous postoperative monitoring provides additional insight to postoperative patient progress.

Indexed as

Lumbar spineobjective assessmentpatient monitoringpost-operative recoveryspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID35875621
PMCPMC9263729
OpenAlexW4285121152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.