ReviewZeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie2022
[Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilation after ECMO versus long-term mechanical ventilation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic global health systems are confronted with a large number of unknown problems. Venovenous (vv) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cases of therapy refractive ARDS often represents a last resort treatment. To improve the health care it is necessary to identify possible influencing factors. Objective: This analysis presents the findings of an ECMO centre and aims to identify potential factors with an impact on vv-ECMO therapy in cases of COVID-19. Material and methods: Between 03/2020 and 01/2022 Results: Overall Conclusion: The use of vv-ECMO in cases of therapy resistant ARDS in COVID-19 still correlates with a high mortality and as such should only be considered as a last resort of intensive care treatment.According to our expectations we could notice better therapy results for younger patients as well as for women in our patient database. In addition, for most comorbidities we could not prove any negative influence on the therapy outcome. This knowledge could help to identify future high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.