ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Modeling Polygenic Antibiotic Resistance Evolution in Biofilms.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Persistence Modulates the Speed, Magnitude, and Onset of Antibiotic Resistance Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Identifiability, Sensitivity, and Genetic Algorithms in Bacterial Biofilm Selection Models.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Genome co-adaptation and the evolution of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Investigating the consequences of the mating system for drug resistance evolution inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Colistin resistance dynamics inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Natural phytochemical-based strategies for antibiofilm applications.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Alternate Antimicrobial Therapies and Their Companion Tests.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling framework as a tool to predict drug resistance evolution.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recalcitrance of biofilms to antimicrobials is a multi-factorial phenomenon, including genetic, physical, and physiological changes. Individually, they often cannot account for biofilm recalcitrance. However, their combination can increase the minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics needed to kill bacterial cells by three orders of magnitude, explaining bacterial survival under otherwise lethal drug treatment. The relative contributions of these factors depend on the specific antibiotics, bacterial strain, as well as environmental and growth conditions. An emerging population genetic property-increased biofilm genetic diversity-further enhances biofilm recalcitrance. Here, we develop a polygenic model of biofilm recalcitrance accounting for multiple phenotypic mechanisms proposed to explain biofilm recalcitrance. The model can be used to generate predictions about the emergence of resistance-its timing and population genetic consequences. We use the model to simulate various treatments and experimental setups. Our simulations predict that the evolution of resistance is impaired in biofilms at low antimicrobial concentrations while it is facilitated at higher concentrations. In scenarios that allow bacteria exchange between planktonic and biofilm compartments, the evolution of resistance is further facilitated compared to scenarios without exchange. We compare these predictions to published experimental observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.