ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Printability of Double Network Alginate-Based Hydrogel for 3D Bio-Printed Complex Structures.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding triple negative breast cancer bone metastasis: from 3D bioprinted models to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Mechanobiology-based strategies for the maturation of biofabricated cartilage constructs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Spider Silk-Inspired Conductive Hydrogels for Enhanced Toughness and Environmental Resilience via Dense Hierarchical Structuring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Hydrogel Formulation for Biomimetic Fibroblast Cell Culture: Exploring Effects of External Stresses and Cellular Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Bridging the Gap: Animal Models in Next-Generation Reproductive Technologies for Male Fertility Preservation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hydrogel Drug Delivery Systems for Bone Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bio-printing has recently emerged as a crucial technology in tissue engineering, yet there are still challenges in selecting materials to obtain good print quality. Therefore, it is essential to study the influence of the chosen material (i.e., bio-ink) and the printing parameters on the final result. The "printability" of a bio-ink indicates its suitability for bio-printing. Hydrogels are a great choice because of their biocompatibility, but their printability is crucial for exploiting their properties and ensuring high printing accuracy. However, the printing settings are seldom addressed when printing hydrogels. In this context, this study explored the printability of double network (DN) hydrogels, from printing lines (1D structures) to lattices (2D structures) and 3D tubular structures, with a focus on printing accuracy. The DN hydrogel has two entangled cross-linked networks and a balanced mechanical performance combining high strength, toughness, and biocompatibility. The combination of poly (ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEDGA) and sodium alginate (SA) enables the qualities mentioned earlier to be met, as well as the use of UV to prevent filament collapse under gravity. Critical correlations between the printability and settings, such as velocity and viscosity of the ink, were identified. PEGDA/alginate-based double network hydrogels were explored and prepared, and printing conditions were improved to achieve 3D complex architectures, such as tubular structures. The DN solution ink was found to be unsuitable for extrudability; hence, glycerol was added to enhance the process. Different glycerol concentrations and flow rates were investigated. The solution containing 25% glycerol and a flow rate of 2 mm/s yielded the best printing accuracy. Thanks to these parameters, a line width of 1 mm and an angle printing inaccuracy of less than 1° were achieved, indicating good shape accuracy. Once the optimal parameters were identified, a tubular structure was achieved with a high printing accuracy. This study demonstrated a 3D printing hydrogel structure using a commercial 3D bio-printer (REGEMAT 3D BIO V1) by synchronizing all parameters, serving as a reference for future more complex 3D structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.