Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Printability of Double Network Alginate-Based Hydrogel for 3D Bio-Printed Complex Structures.

Immacolata Greco, Vanja Miskovic, Carolina Varon, Chiara Marraffa, Carlo S Iorio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Immacolata GrecoUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Vanja MiskovicUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Carolina VaronUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara MarraffaUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Carlo S IorioUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bio-printing has recently emerged as a crucial technology in tissue engineering, yet there are still challenges in selecting materials to obtain good print quality. Therefore, it is essential to study the influence of the chosen material (i.e., bio-ink) and the printing parameters on the final result. The "printability" of a bio-ink indicates its suitability for bio-printing. Hydrogels are a great choice because of their biocompatibility, but their printability is crucial for exploiting their properties and ensuring high printing accuracy. However, the printing settings are seldom addressed when printing hydrogels. In this context, this study explored the printability of double network (DN) hydrogels, from printing lines (1D structures) to lattices (2D structures) and 3D tubular structures, with a focus on printing accuracy. The DN hydrogel has two entangled cross-linked networks and a balanced mechanical performance combining high strength, toughness, and biocompatibility. The combination of poly (ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEDGA) and sodium alginate (SA) enables the qualities mentioned earlier to be met, as well as the use of UV to prevent filament collapse under gravity. Critical correlations between the printability and settings, such as velocity and viscosity of the ink, were identified. PEGDA/alginate-based double network hydrogels were explored and prepared, and printing conditions were improved to achieve 3D complex architectures, such as tubular structures. The DN solution ink was found to be unsuitable for extrudability; hence, glycerol was added to enhance the process. Different glycerol concentrations and flow rates were investigated. The solution containing 25% glycerol and a flow rate of 2 mm/s yielded the best printing accuracy. Thanks to these parameters, a line width of 1 mm and an angle printing inaccuracy of less than 1° were achieved, indicating good shape accuracy. Once the optimal parameters were identified, a tubular structure was achieved with a high printing accuracy. This study demonstrated a 3D printing hydrogel structure using a commercial 3D bio-printer (REGEMAT 3D BIO V1) by synchronizing all parameters, serving as a reference for future more complex 3D structures.

Indexed as

3D bio-printingalginatebiomaterialshydrogelsink viscosityshape fidelity

Identifiers

PMID35875487
PMCPMC9304713
OpenAlexW4284886149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.