Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875275›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Assessment of Quality of Life After Ventral Hernia Repair: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Centre.

Mahendra Lodha, Darshan Patel, Mayank Badkur, Satya Prakash Meena, Ashok Puranik, Ramkaran Chaudhary, Indra Singh Choudhary, Metlapalli V Sairam, Anupam Singh Chauhan, Rashi Lodha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mahendra LodhaGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Darshan PatelGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Mayank BadkurGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Satya Prakash MeenaGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Ashok PuranikGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Ramkaran ChaudharyGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Indra Singh ChoudharyGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Metlapalli V SairamGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Anupam Singh ChauhanGeneral Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Jodhpur, IND.
Rashi LodhaMedical Intern, Dr. Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ventral hernias are usually repaired by an open or laparoscopic approach. Quality of life after ventral hernia repair is a very important but often underestimated parameter. This prospective observational study was conducted to assess the quality of life and other related parameters after all types of ventral hernia repair, mainly between open and laparoscopic repairs.  Objectives This study aimed to determine the quality of life after ventral hernia repairs. We also analysed and compared various parameters such as outcomes and satisfaction, postoperative pain, and complications between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.  Methods This was a hospital-based prospective observational study conducted from January 2020 to December 2021, which included a total of 70 patients with ventral hernias. Thirty-nine patients underwent open repair and 31 patients underwent laparoscopic repair. Demographic data and other data such as postoperative hospital stay, return to activity, postoperative pain, complications, and quality of life were collected and analysed. Results The distribution of different types of hernias observed in our study included 34% incisional hernias, 33% umbilical and paraumbilical hernias, and 33% epigastric hernias. The incidence of complications was significantly less in laparoscopic repair compared to open repair. Also, satisfaction at 1 month was significantly more in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group. However, there is no significant difference in the postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay, return to activity, satisfaction at discharge, and quality of life at 1 month in both the laparoscopic and open repairs.  Conclusion Laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs are associated with lesser complications and higher satisfaction. The use of tackers and trans-fascial sutures can significantly increase postoperative pain in laparoscopic repair and is the major factor affecting the short-term quality of life in laparoscopic repairs. As there is no difference in postoperative pain, hospital stay, and return to activity, laparoscopic repairs should be preferred wherever possible in view of fewer complications and higher satisfaction.

Indexed as

abdomen ventral hernialaproscopic ventral hernia repairopen ventral hernia repairquality of life (qol)short-term outcome

Identifiers

PMID35875275
PMCPMC9300814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.