Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35875255›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2022

Investigating the transfer rate of waterpipe additives to smoke as an integral part of toxicological risk assessments.

J C Miller Holt, B Mayer-Helm, J Gafner, M Zierlinger, C Hirn, T Paschke, G Eilenberger, M Kuba, S Pummer, M Charriere

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J C Miller HoltJT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
B Mayer-HelmOekolab Gesellschaft Fuer Umweltanalytik Ges.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria.
J GafnerJT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
M ZierlingerOekolab Gesellschaft Fuer Umweltanalytik Ges.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria.
C HirnJT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
T PaschkeJT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
G EilenbergerOekolab Gesellschaft Fuer Umweltanalytik Ges.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria.
M KubaOekolab Gesellschaft Fuer Umweltanalytik Ges.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria.
S PummerOekolab Gesellschaft Fuer Umweltanalytik Ges.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria.
M CharriereJT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterpipe, also known as hookah, narghile or narghila, shisha or hubbly bubbly, is a tobacco-smoking device. Waterpipe tobacco is heated and consumed by a process of inhaling tobacco smoke, that bubbles through water before being inhaled. To date, limited studies have examined the transfer of waterpipe additives from tobacco to smoke. This study was designed to investigate the filtration ability of water in the waterpipe's bowl to define exposure to additives in waterpipe smoke, which is an essential requirement to perform toxicological risk assessments of waterpipe additives. Within this study, a standard smoking protocol (ISO 22486) was used to evaluate the transfer of > 40 additives from experimental and commercially available samples. These results are the first to provide such an extensive dataset of information showing transfer rates varying between 6% and 61% depending on the additive. Various physicochemical parameters of the additives including water solubility, partition coefficient, molecular weight, boiling point, and vapor pressure were also evaluated to seek to identify any correlation to transfer rate that may be later used to predict transfer. The amount of additive transfer from waterpipe tobacco to the smoke was found to be moderately correlated to vapor pressure (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.33) with subsequent multivariate analysis using step-wise selection indicating 39% of the transfer rate variance can be explained collectively by the additive boiling point, molecular weight, vapor pressure and water solubility. These findings underscore the complexity of additive transfer and highlight the necessity of exposure assessment for meaningful waterpipe additive risk assessments.

Indexed as

Additive Physicochemical propertiesAdditive transferExposure assessmentISO 22486 and charcoalTransfer predictionWaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID35875255
PMCPMC9301603
OpenAlexW4224247930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.