ArticleJournal of food science and technology2022
Flow test by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative reveals distinct viscosity parameters of three thickening agents.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) flow test is useful for the global standardization of food consistencies of dysphagia patients. In clinical practice, different compositions of food thickeners are commonly used, directly influencing viscosity parameters and swallowing physiology. We aimed to compare the IDDSI thickness levels, remaining volume in the syringe (RVS), and viscosity parameters of three different food thickeners. As a secondary objective, we compared the cost of preparing 100 mL of thickened drinks using the studied thickeners. Thickeners A (xanthan gum), B (corn starch, tara gum, xanthan gum, and guar gum), and C (corn starch) were prepared in increasing concentrations from 1 to 7 g/100 mL and were assayed in quintuplicate using the IDDSI flow test. Thickeners A, B, and C presented statistically different results for the IDDSI levels, RVS, and viscosity parameters at all concentrations. Thickener A reached higher levels in the IDDSI framework, RVS, and viscosity parameters compared with thickeners B and C. A large range of RVS was observed at different concentrations for thickener B compared with C. Regarding viscosity, thickeners B and C, with corn starch in their composition, showed exponential behavior as concentrations increased, while thickener A presented a linear trend. The thickener composition was significantly influenced by IDDSI classification, RVS, and viscosity parameters. The study shows that xanthan gum thickeners present less variability in IDDSI, RVS, and viscosity compared with starch-based thickeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.