ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
m
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies reported the related role of RNA n6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in tumorigenesis and development. However, it is not clear whether m6A modification also plays a potential role in the immune regulation of rectal cancer (RC) and the formation of tumor microenvironment. Methods: In this study, we screened 23 m6A regulatory factors from 369 rectal cancer specimens, further determined the modification patterns of m6A in RC, and systematically linked these modification patterns with the characteristics of TME cell infiltration. The principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm was used to evaluate the m6A modification pattern of a single tumor related to immune response. Results: Three different m6A modification patterns were found in the measurement results, which are related to different clinical results and biological pathways. TME identification results show that the identified m6A pattern is closely related to immune characteristics. According to the m6Ascore extracted from m6A-related signature genes, RC patients were divided into high and low score subgroups combined with tumor mutation burden. Patients with high tumor mutation burden and higher m6Ascore have a significant survival advantage and enhanced immune infiltration. Further analysis showed that patients with higher m6Ascore had higher PD-L1 expression levels and showed better immune response and lasting clinical benefits. Conclusions: M6A modification plays a crucial role in the formation of TME diversity and complexity. The evaluation of the m6A modification mode will help us to enhance our understanding of the characteristics of TME infiltration and provide new insights for more effective immunotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.