ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast in a Male Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound features and clinicopathologic correlations of breast adenoid cystic carcinoma: a retrospective observational study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in the Male Breast: Clinical Presentation and Histopathological Evaluation.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Male Breast: An Exceptionally Rare Presentation.Case reports in pathology · 2026Article
- The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on M0 adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER data.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Adenoid cystic carcinoma in a male breast: a case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Solid subtype of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast with multiple distant metastases: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast (breast ACC) is a rare tumor, especially in men, with only 17 cases reported in the literature. Owing to this rarity, male breast ACC is susceptible to missed or incorrect diagnoses, and data on treatment options and prognosis is also scarce. Herein, we report a case of a male patient with primary breast ACC and performed a detailed clinicopathological analysis of the 17 cases reported in the literature. A 38-year-old Chinese man patient developed right-sided breast nipple retraction in 2013 and presented to our hospital in 2015 with a palpable mass in the right breast for four days. B-scan ultrasound indicated the presence of a solid space-occupying lesion in the right breast. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classified the lesion as category 4B, and mammography showed a right breast nodule classified as BI-RADS 4C. Modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer was performed on the right breast. Microscopic examination of the excised tissue revealed diffuse tumor invasion of the subcutaneous fibers and adipose tissue, with tumor cells arranged in cribriform, tubular, and microcystic patterns. Immunohistochemical staining indicated that the glandular epithelial cells were positive for CD117, CK7, and Ki67 (approximately 30%) and negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, while the myoepithelial/basal cells were positive for P63, CK5/6 and S-100. Moreover, basement membrane materials were positive for collagen type IV. Molecular pathology analysis by fluorescence
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.